Talk:Big Blue River Bridge (Grafton, Nebraska)
 | Big Blue River Bridge (Grafton, Nebraska) was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 29, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Big Blue River Bridge was one of the first of nearly 30 concrete bridges designed by engineer William A. Biba? | |||||||||
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Project Fillmore County
edit
|
Project Fillmore County | |
| This article is part of Project Fillmore County, a project created to bring all sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places in Fillmore County, Nebraska up to Good Article or Featured Article status. The project needs your help! If you wish to sign up and help, please do so here. |
- Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 03:11, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Big Blue River Bridge (Grafton, Nebraska)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 00:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I am starting a review of this article. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 00:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Review discussion
editThis article seems a bit sparse and spotty. I think that the main editor has done a good job based on the sources that they have found. This main root cause is that right now it has no sources that provide substantial coverage of the topic. The sources are just brief listings, mentions, registration forms and sources not about the bridge which support other statements which are not about the bridge. I'm thinking that it is current borderline on meeting wp:notability....I don't want to go there, but with even that being a question in my mind, I would not be able to pass it as a GA in its current state. Could find a source that really discusses it? Even a newspaper article? I am open to conversation, or waiting for a few weeks, (if I get some response within a week). Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 02:03, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- OK I've waited 13 days and no response. I am forced to non-pass this article for the discussed reasons. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 13:49, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
GA criteria final checklist
editWell-written
- Several items are confusing. I would be happy to get into more detail and /or help on this if the other bigger issue gets resolved. North8000 (talk) 01:51, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Factually accurate and verifiable
- See review discussion. North8000 (talk) 01:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Broad in its coverage
- See review discussionNorth8000 (talk) 01:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each
- Meets this criteria North8000 (talk) 01:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
- Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Illustrated, if possible, by images
- Meets this criteria. Has 3 images, no non-free images, so no article-specific use rationales are required.