Talk:Mercian Regiment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mercian Regiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled
edit- "It was expected that the regiment's cap badge would have be a double headed Mercian Eagle with Saxon crown, but this has been rejected by the Army Board due to it's strong Territorial Army connection."
Well, if you go on the website, there's a great big double-headed Mercian eagle with Saxon crown....
- It appears to me that the badges of the Mercian Brigade/Mercian Volunteers and the Mercian Regiment are exactly the same. What changes were actually made after the Army Dress Committee rejected the 'strangled chicken' design? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.88.21 (talk) 15:35, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- The colour, as far as I can see... the Brigade badge's eagle was all silver, Here's one at ebay:[1]. It looks like the new version has a gold beak and legs [2]. A small difference, but presumably enough to keep the Committee happy? Lozleader 12:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Type
editIsnt the type being "Light infantry" redundant and incorrect by the "role" section that shows the regiments battalions being light infantry/Mechanized infantry/reservists.--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 20:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Merge 4 Mercian
editWithout a substantial amount of information on this, or other battalions, I propose to merge 4 Mercian into Mercian Regiment. Chachu207 talk to me 18:42, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Agree. I see no reason not to do this; not very much links to 4 Mercian, so it would not be controversial. [ dotKuro ] [ talk ] [ contribs ] 17:16, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. I think articles on individual battalions are perfectly acceptable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with both of you, if the battalion has some notably by itself an article is appropriate. However this battalion at this period in time does not seem to be, as it has never been on active service. Jim Sweeney (talk) 14:43, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mercian Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.army.mod.uk/infantry/regiments/6449.aspx
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.army.mod.uk/documents/general/MERCIAN_Customs.doc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:23, 3 May 2016 (UTC)