Madsen-Saetter machine gun

The Madsen-Saetter machine gun was a Danish general-purpose machine gun designed in the early 1950s by Eric Larsen-Saetter.

Madsen-Saetter machine gun
Indonesian Army Madsen-Saetter
TypeGeneral-purpose machine gun
Place of originDenmark
Service history
Used by
Production history
DesignerEric Larsen-Saetter
Designed1952–1960
ManufacturerDISA
Specifications
Mass11.6 kg (25.57 lb)
Length1,290 mm (50.8 in)
Barrel length660 mm (26.0 in)

Cartridge7.62×51mm NATO
.30-06 Springfield
.50 BMG
Actiongas-operated
Rate of fire700–1000 rounds/min
Muzzle velocity838 m/s (2,749 ft/s)
Feed systembelt
Sightsblade foresight and a tangent notch rearsight

Service history

edit

The machine gun was tested by the British Army but the FN MAG was preferred.[1] Indonesia produced the Mark II version[2] in .30-06[3] under license at Pindad.[4] Salvadoran Army also received Madsen-Saetters in .30-06, some being latter locally modified to fire 7.62×51mm NATO rounds.[5]

Variants

edit
 
Madsen-Saetter .50 cal on naval twin mount
  • Madsen-Saetter Mk I[3]
  • Madsen-Saetter Mk II[3]
  • Madsen-Saetter Mk III: more reliable and shorter version, developed from 1959[3]
  • Madsen-Saetter Mk IV: new version, shorter and lighter[3]
  • Madsen-Saetter tank machine gun: tank-mounted version, has no bipod and buttstock. Could be converted for field use by using special lightweight tripod. Manufactured in limited numbers.[6]
  • Masen-Saetter cal. 50 machine gun: prototype of a .50 BMG version. Could be mounted on tanks and armored vehicles, anti-aircraft wheeled mount (similar to DShK wheeled mount), and anti-personnel light tripod.[7]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Moody, J.R. (August 1998). "Madsen Saetter GPMG". Small Arms Review. Vol. 1, no. 11.
  2. ^ Smith 1969, p. 461.
  3. ^ a b c d e Smith 1969, p. 342.
  4. ^ Popenker, Maxim. "Madsen-Saetter". modernfirearms.net.
  5. ^ Montes, Julio A. (May 2000). "Infantry Weapons of the Salvadoran Forces". Small Arms Review. No. 8.
  6. ^ Smith 1969, p. 342-343.
  7. ^ Smith 1969, p. 344.