This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This is not the place for entire bios and former posts. At least, not in the present form of the article (which follows the model of previous elections).
I understand the order to be followed is: a) order of nominations, and b) when made by the same national group (necessarily at the same time), the order chosen by the national group.
Finally, both the fact that the Brazilian national group nominated two candidates and that one of them has denounced that the is unable to advance his campaign because of the "express determination" of Jair Bolsonaro, "for ideological reasons and in retaliation to positions defended by me in articles and interviews" are both highly unusual. Since Casella's note with these comments was included in this article, I felt important to contextualise it. The note is way harsher than my own reconstruction (discussing matters of democracy, coup d'état, and the role of law). I am not sure these clarifications should be included. Maybe the article should simply list the candidates. Otherwise, the whole saga might merit a special subsection of the article, explaining the particularities of the highly unusual circumstances that have led Brazil to have two candidates. Casella is still a candidate.
