Talk:Ariwara no Narihira
Ariwara no Narihira has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 26, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ariwara no Narihira received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
A fact from Ariwara no Narihira appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 May 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 9, 2020 and July 9, 2022. |
Other Narihira poems discussed by Keene that might be cited in the article later
editPoem 622:
Japanese text[1] | Romanized Japanese[2] | English translation[2] |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Poem 970:
Japanese text[3] | Romanized Japanese[4] | English translation[4] |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Poem 133:
Japanese text[5] | Romanized Japanese[6] | English translation[6] |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Poem 617:
Japanese text[7] | Romanized Japanese[8] | English translation[8] |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Poem 618:
Japanese text[7] | Romanized Japanese[9] | English translation[9] |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Poem 410:
Japanese text[10] | Romanized Japanese[9] | English translation[9] |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Poem 411:
Japanese text[11] | Romanized Japanese[12] | English translation[12] |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Poem 645:
Japanese text[13] | Romanized Japanese[14] | English translation[14] |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Poem 646:
Japanese text[15] | Romanized Japanese[14] | English translation[14] |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Narihira in setsuwa literature
editNarihira was a recurring figure in later tale (setsuwa) literature,[citation needed] such as in tales 35 and 36 of Book 24 of the Konjaku Monogatarishū.[16]
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ariwara no Narihira/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Will review. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- General
- No copyvio/dablink/external link issues
- Duplinks: I can see many, use this tool to fix them
- Done—there are still a couple left, but they're redirects that could be turned into full articles. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 21:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Lead
- The lead should be a good 2 to 3 paras long for an article of this length covering all major points in the article
- Say AD/BC in 825–880
- Is that really necessary? There are no BC dates in recorded Japanese history. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 21:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Whoops, didn't know that. But articles should generally mention AD/BC at first mention. May be someone who does not know of this, like me, will get confused. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:20, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- WP:ERA says, "In general, do not use CE or AD unless required to avoid ambiguity". Regardless, as the dates increase rather than decrease, any confusion would be temporary, I would imagine. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 11:15, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- Whoops, didn't know that. But articles should generally mention AD/BC at first mention. May be someone who does not know of this, like me, will get confused. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:20, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- Is that really necessary? There are no BC dates in recorded Japanese history. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 21:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Birth and ancestry
- Begin the article with the full name of the person
- Say AD/BC in the first line
- Romantic affairs
- You should add the names of one or a few of each of these parties of speculators you mention in the 2nd para. Presently "it has been" sounds vague on this.
- Given the specualtion took place over many cneturies, that would be difficult. The sources used in the article don't name them, and hunting them down in mediaeval texts may constitute OR or SYNTH.
- Poetry
- Combined, poems attributed to Narihira in court anthologies total eighty-seven "87" would make this less wordy.
- according to Rodd and Henkenius Who are they?
- Literary scholars and translators. I've now qualified them. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 21:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the changes. The prose is excellent, I await you response to one last comment. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:20, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification. I am happy to promote this. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ Katagiri 2009 : 255-256.
- ^ a b Keene 1999 : 225.
- ^ Katagiri 2009 : 380.
- ^ a b Keene 1999 : 227.
- ^ Katagiri 2009 : 84.
- ^ a b Keene 1999 : 228.
- ^ a b Katagiri 2009 : 254.
- ^ a b Keene 1999 : 229-230.
- ^ a b c d Keene 1999 : 230.
- ^ Katagiri 2009 : 184.
- ^ Katagiri 2009 : 185.
- ^ a b Keene 1999 : 231.
- ^ Katagiri 2009 : 264.
- ^ a b c d Keene 1999 : 232.
- ^ Katagiri 2009 : 264-265.
- ^ Mabuchi et al. 2001 : 605.
Father of Emperor Yozei?
editIs there any source for this rumor? (In English, or vouched for by someone who's better at reading Japanese?) If so, it might be good to add both the source here and a small trivia section to the page on the Emperor Yozei. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tabbycatlove (talk • contribs) 17:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Tabbycatlove: The sources are cited in the article. Unfortunately at present they are mostly in Japanese. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 22:39, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:38, 17 July 2021 (UTC)