Wikipedia

Talk:British National Day

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

British Day in Germany

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article currently doesn't make much sense, in terms of the date supplied at the end of the article. Could someone clarify? --82.25.59.225 (talk) 21:53, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Foundation Day

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago11 comments4 people in discussion

We have a British Day that no-one celebrates as it is on the same day as May day (May 1) It is Foundation Day or Anniversary Day The date that the Acts of Union 1707 took effect, That joined the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland (previously separate states, with separate legislatures but with the same monarch) into a single United Kingdom of Great Britain. Mr Taz (talk) 19:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

"A British Day that no-one celebrates". Precisely. Because it does not exist. The actual date of the Act of Union is another matter entirely: nobody is contesting that and if people want to find out about it they can read the article. Enaidmawr (talk) 20:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
There is no such event as 'Foundation Day' in the United Kingdom, that is a completely made up term. As for the 1st of May, regardless of what you want to call it, it is not a public holiday in the UK nor is it observed or celebrated in a notable way. It is, as correctly pointed out, the day the first Parliament of Great Britain met formally uniting the Kingdoms of England and Scotland.--Breadandcheese (talk) 21:32, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for confirming that, Breadandhceese. Unfortunately Mr Taz thinks otherwise and keeps inserting it here (and elsewhere). That, and the fact that what we need is a reference confirming the date of the Act of Union as a candidate for 'British Day', rather than a link leading to a page about the historical event, is the sole reason why I revert his persistent edits. Whatever our personal opinions may be this is an encyclopedia - in theory at least... - and should stick to the facts. There is no such thing as 'Foundation Day' (now apparently also known as 'Anniversary Day', it would seem). Enaidmawr (talk) 21:51, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

There is a event called 'Foundation Day' and 'Anniversary Day' for Great Britain and later the United Kingdom from the Acts of Union as in "The act of founding, especially the establishment of an institution with provisions for future maintenance" from [|Foundation [definition]]

There may have been a foundation day for the UK, but not a Foundation Day. The difference is the use of a proper noun. --Breadandcheese (talk) 21:09, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Anniversary Day [300th Anniversary of the Act of Union] Mr Taz (talk) 19:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

No, it was just mentioning the 300th anniversary of the Act of Union. Like with other days you believe exist, "Anniversary Day" does not. O Fenian (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. Checked the BBC article as well. What's more this constant insertion of references to this imaginary day are becoming a real pain. Mr Taz, just because you think that such a day exists (as opposed to the event) does not mean you can keep on putting it on wikipedia ad nauseam. Please stop. Enaidmawr (talk) 19:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Big Ben Day [1]? Mr Taz has received a three day timeout for his latest attempt to add Foundation Day to Wikipedia, I hope that will discourage him from doing it again. O Fenian (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Unfortunate that such steps are sometimes necessary, but let's hope it works. At least I can have a rest from my "crusade to stop REAL National Days" for a few days(!). Enaidmawr (talk) 20:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


OK?? O Fenian Big Ben Day they already have day's for bits of coths ere flags (Flag Day) Mr Taz (talk) 22:45, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Protected

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've protected this article for a period of 1 week due to the current edit warring. Please discuss sensibly on the talk page before the protection reverts. Canterbury Tail talk 13:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

At least the protection will give me a rest from this tedious process, for which I am grateful, but there is really nothing to discuss, sensibly or otherwise. Put simply, there is no such beast as this so-called "Foundation Day"/"Anniversary Day". How can we accept its continued insertion here or anywhere else on wikipedia? There is no justification for these constant edits by Mr Taz. You will see above that Breadandcheese agrees with me. It is relevant here that a considerable chasm exists between our political views particularly with regard to the UK/Britain, as we both well know from previous experience, so the fact that we both concur on this should surely give some food for thought. I don't know where Mr Taz gets this idea from, and he is entitled to his point of view, but the placing of "Foundation Day" in the list here is contrary to the most basic of wikipedia principles. That is my sole concern. What will be the position when this is unlocked if these edits continue? I do not want an "edit war" at all but any responsible wikipedia editor would take the same action, no matter what the subject might be: if it's untrue it's untrue (WP:VERIFIABILITY) and should not be included presented as a fact. As for proof, there is none, as Mr Taz's meaningless "references" prove (see article history and check them out if you like). This should not be allowed to continue. Enaidmawr (talk) 18:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

foundation Day

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

with a small 'f'. I do not believe the New Statesman adequately sources this. While it does source the 1st of May, it does not explicitly source why this particular day, and indeed makes reference to the May Day festival and does not even mention that it is also the date of the formation of the UK. Thoughts from anyone else? O Fenian (talk) 00:40, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've modified the section: Green party proposal refers to the ancient May Day / international workers' day, not 1707 union. Also there is no mention of so-called "Foundation Day" in either source (as one would expect). Enaidmawr (talk) 23:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Foundation Days

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

As we have these days 'Foundation Day for the United Kingdom' jan 1 and 'Foundation Day for Great Britain' May 1. We need to work on other National days Scottish Day, English Day, Welsh Day and Cornish Day like Ulster Day that cover all the People not Religious believers on Saints days Mr Taz (talk) 20:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

==Guy Fawkes Day==ecause of I thought that Guy Fawkes Day was the UK national holiday, because it is famous abroad. And it's famous because it is really celebrated by people in a traditional way with bonfires, like a true, not formal, national holiday. Lele giannoni (talk) 21:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on British National Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British National Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British National Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:British_National_Day&oldid=1229639562"