Rating on Request dated 4 March 2017 (UTC)

edit

Decision was settled on Start Class. Information is pretty adequate. However, history section seems to be lacking in relation to the school age. Also, "rebuilding" can go into the history section instead, as it kind of cause that section to be chaotic. Recommended flow: History, Campus, Programmes and Curriculum, Extra-curricular Activities, Alumni; References

Also, do not place excessive information on what the school website would naturally offer, such as result analysis by year. This does not serve the function of Wikipedia.

Try to work on these and this article could be a B Class candidate. Lyg 2001 (talk) 06:11, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply