 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | A fact from Dacia Duster appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 March 2009, and was viewed approximately 3,300 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Move
editTo have a more intuitive name, this page should either be moved to Dacia Duster (2009 concept car) or Dacia Duster (2009 car), or moved to Dacia Duster over the redirect (and then leave a dablink at ARO 10, the page where Dacia Duster currently redirects). Any preference? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 13:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Flat-4
edit- That the Dacia Logan has a Flat-4 is news to me ??? Hektor (talk) 05:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Fair use image
editSince the vehicle as been shown in Geneva 2009, I think claiming fair use for lack of replaceability is a bit of a stretch... Hektor (talk) 05:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Not in Israel
editThe Duster isn't sold (and was never sold) in Israel, contrary to what the article stated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rtwingo (talk • contribs) 20:15, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Use of "wagon" in explaining vehicle class
editI do not think that wagon is the correct term to use in this case, and one such as "Crossover" (Crossover (automobile)) or Small Sports Utility" (SUV) vehicle or similar would be a better fit. In addition, the "Wagon" page links to a page about historical Wagons, not the colloquialism that I believe is in modern use. The Duster can be viewed as competing with other brand vehicles in the Crossover class. Digressing slightly Three-box_styling contradicts that slightly, but is talking about a specific and different type of vehicle In conclusion, I suggest "Wagon" be updated to "Crossover" Laheugan (talk) 18:24, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Never mind, these idiots don't know the difference between a jeep and a beetle! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.189.224.249 (talk) 15:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Older version 1985..2005
editThe previous vehicle with this name is not mentioned, see - https://www.motorbase.com/vehicle/profile/dacia-duster/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.187.174.82 (talk) 22:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- It's a separate article ARO 10. Peter James (talk) 09:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
The Aro 10 is completly different... RainbowThunderZ (talk) 15:11, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dacia Duster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716073344/http://www.thenewsmarket.com/Releases/StoryDetailPage.aspx?GUID=aec50d61-b28c-4875-b834-7008afc9fa9a&bhjs=0 to http://www.thenewsmarket.com/Releases/StoryDetailPage.aspx?GUID=aec50d61-b28c-4875-b834-7008afc9fa9a&bhjs=0
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716161433/http://www.renault.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/Communiqu%C3%A9%20de%20presse/en-EN/Pieces%20jointes/21971_DACIA_-_GB_DB1D7020.pdf to http://www.renault.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/Communiqu%C3%A9%20de%20presse/en-EN/Pieces%20jointes/21971_DACIA_-_GB_DB1D7020.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Références
editI need références for 2nd generation Yayo43 (talk) 08:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Me too. --Weissmann (talk) 05:23, 18 August 2023 (UTC)