Talk:Dalmatia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dalmatia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | See also: Talk:History of Dalmatia |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Ethnicity of inhabitants of Dalmatian
editThere is no evidence from analysis of ethnic ancestry of present population of Dalmatia inffered from the Y-chromosome haplogroup distribution data to back the claim that ethnic origin of Fetivi, Boduli and Vlaji as distinct groups of people reflects different ethnic backgrounds, as the article claims. It should be removed from the article as the citations provided do no prove such a claim. Cultural differences between those groups, which are indeed prominent and discussed in the cited articles, are also largely intermixed and much more complex than what this article claims, as they involve high degree of regional specificity. 78.1.111.12 (talk) 22:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- The article doesn't claim they are distinctive ethnic identities or having different ethnic origin. However, the paragraph does seem to be poorly sourced and mention of that information - which is almost trivial - doesn't seem as a part of necessary scope of the article.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 22:47, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced, original research
editToday's reverted edit caught my eye... Large parts of the article are without references, or are original research, or misrepresentation of the sources (cherry-picked data, comments nowhere to be found in the sources), etc. I've marked only a few in Special:Diff/1256323131, and am asking for proper sourcing with no original research. Because a lack of content is better than misleading or false content, unsourced content may be challenged and removed. Thank you. Ponor (talk) 10:22, 9 November 2024 (UTC)