Lead rewrite for better readability?

edit

Don’t know if anyone else felt the same way, but the lead is a little bit clunky. Might not be the biggest of issues but if others are getting that impression too it might need a rewrite; there are a few sentences (i.e. “Practitioners may classify … are in different locations”, “Many schools of energy healing … or Qigong”, etc.) that are hard on the reader, I think at least. If enough are in support of that I might spend some time rewriting the lead just a little bit, not to change content but to make it simpler and easier to read. OverzealousAutocorrect (talk) 00:00, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree that a bit of a tidy-up would be good, thanks for suggesting! Do go ahead from my POV. I'll give it a proof-read when you're ready. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 09:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Alright, I’ll rewrite it when I’ve got time today and let everyone know once it needs a proofread. OverzealousAutocorrect (talk) 12:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Research Methods in Clinical Psychology

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 March 2024 and 9 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BT28 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by BT28 (talk) 22:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply