Talk:Gas leak

Cleanup

Maybe a section sould be added about how known gas leaks are fixed and homes made safe from explosions. --Ncusa367 21:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Leakage rates

I'm curious whether anyone has an idea about what proportion of gas is leaked from pipe networks all the way from the wellhead to the customer's house. It would be very interesting to have some reliable information about this. Thomas.Hedden (talk) 16:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

helium deectors for underground natural gas leaks

why helium tests instead of air? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.110.31.4 (talk) 01:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Gas leak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131203010955/http://www.wvu.edu/~agexten/hortcult/treeshru/treeprob.htm to http://www.wvu.edu/~agexten/hortcult/treeshru/treeprob.htm
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131203001429/http://www.wickedlocal.com/marblehead/news/x793337975/With-natural-gas-leaks-widespread-lawmakers-revisit-fixes to http://www.wickedlocal.com/marblehead/news/x793337975/With-natural-gas-leaks-widespread-lawmakers-revisit-fixes

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:43, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gas leak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110319154501/http://www.naturalgaswatch.org/ to http://www.naturalgaswatch.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Leak grades

Hello fellow wikipedians,

I want to know if the section "leak grades" is necessary as it is only about the US standards, and may be different in many other countries. I believe it can be replaced by a single link to the source page, instead of a detailed section. The other sections such as "Massachusetts" also take the US views, which needs to be changed RandomBro (talk) 04:14, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

I agree that this US-specific system is too long for an article that theoretically is meant to cover the entire world. It should either be shortened, or corresponding descriptions for other countries/regions should be added.IAmNitpicking (talk) 01:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)