Talk:Henry Blofeld

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Biography assessment rating comment

edit

The article may be improved by following the WPBiogaphy 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 03:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


Related to John Blofeld? Both have Calthorpe in the name... Wooster (talk) 14:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

he has an older brother John who is/was a judge —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnybriggs (talkcontribs) 21:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Brother John Christopher Calthorpe Blofeld, b. 1932. The other John Blofeld is likely a relative though. Ashiyura (talk) 16:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Ernst Stavro Blofeld page contradicts

edit

That page says that the villain is NOT named after Blowers' father. Hmmm.

It is true that the villain is NOT named after Blower's father. The author and Buddhist scholar John Blofeld (who is in fact distantly related to Blowers) knew Fleming through a gentlemen's club. This tell us that Fleming was acquainted with both these branches of the Blofeld family, however it seems most likely that John Blofeld's father was the inspiration for the name, as his name was Ernst Blofeld. This should be rectified to show uniformity across these pages — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.90.37.18 (talk) 15:07, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Blowers.jpg

edit
 

Image:Blowers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image is book cover. Reference to this now made in article. PaddyBriggs 07:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blofeld controversy

edit

I have a vague recollection of Blowers getting into trouble some years ago for describing fans watching events at Headingly from an overlooking roof (or something) as being in the "Jewish stand", which he apologised for. Am I right? We shouldn't include unsourced negativity per BLP but balance dictates that if he's been in hot water we should mention it. --Dweller (talk) 11:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the following text from the article. Although it is well-sourced and I don't dispute its accuracy, I feel that its inclusion gives undue weight to a minor, isolated incident. I also don't see the benefit of repeating the remark and rebroadcasting it to a wider audience, thus causing further potential offence. Dricherby (talk) 22:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
In 1995, Blofeld was censured for an antisemitic comment made on-air at Headingley:

He referred to onlookers watching a match from the balcony of a tall building outside the ground at Headingley as being at “the Jewish end”[1]

Blofeld and the BBC both apologised for a comment that was "not spawned by malice".[1]

I'm going to reinstate it. The comment about UNDUE does not stand up in an article of this length and on the other comments, I refer to WP:NOTCENSORED --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:25, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

Have you ever heard him pronounce 'Cloisters'?

edit

Have you ever heard him pronounce 'Cloisters'? He is well known for saying the word like it rhymes with 'poseurs'. Very strange. 87.113.95.177 (talk) 15:05, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

I've put several tags on this article for citation needed. For a BLP, there is lots which is unreferenced and I do not have the sources to sort it out. There are bits and pieces from newspaper articles, but it really needs his autobiography. Some of the playing career details could be found at CricketArchive if anyone is so inclined. Sarastro1 (talk) 23:09, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Citation needed

edit

I find it incredibly annoying that details in Wikipedia articles that are universally known to be true are annotated as "citation needed". Anyone who has ever listened to Test Match Special must have heard Blofeld saying "my dear old thing" hundreds, if not thousands, of times. Why, oh why, does it need a citation? One might just as well say a citation is needed to say that Obama is President of the USA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyAustria (talkcontribs) 00:34, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. SmokeyTheCat 08:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
My response is a little late, but I found a suitable reference written by his colleague, Vic Marks. I have added it to the article. Axl ¤ [Talk] 11:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry Blofeld. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply