Talk:Just for the Record.../GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 21:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Lead

• What's a "back catalog"?

A back catalog would be the entirety of a singer's discography prior to the release of a new album or song. Carbrera (talk) 20:47, 9 September 2017 (UTC).

• begin "platinum" with capital letter

Done

• set a "(RIAA)" after "Recording Industry..."

Done

• In the Netherlands, Highlights from Just for the Record peaked → ...the Record, a condensed version, peaked (for context)

Done

Infobox

• 1955–1989 → 1955–89

I believe there was recently a discussion somewhere on Wikipedia that suggested including the full year (rather than the condensed version) would be better for the reader. Carbrera (talk) 20:47, 9 September 2017 (UTC).

• Do you have a ref for the genre?

Done

Background and release

• It includes four discs with each → comma before "with"

Done

• Release date in brackets for "You'll Never Know"

Done

• and artwork → plural

Artwork actually wouldn't need a 's' to become plural. Carbrera (talk) 20:47, 9 September 2017 (UTC).

• includes live performances from → are live performances on

Done

Reception

• sixteen weeks → 16 weeks

Done

• gold → Gold

Done

• "(RIAA" after "Recording..."

Done

• platinum → Platinum

Done

• you can remove the brackets to commas

Done

Track listings

• Flawless ;)

Charts

• Flawless ;)

Certifications

• Flawless ;)

Other stuff

Copy-violation

• 41.9% is slightly too much. Please cut out some content from the top citation.

It appears that the top citation from this checker is just so similar because of the extensive track listing [1]. From as far as I can see, this is the only thing triggering it. Carbrera (talk) 20:47, 9 September 2017 (UTC).

References

• As far as I checked them, the references do cover the assertations made in this article (I can't verify the books, so I trust you with this!)
• No dead links! Good job!

Outcome

• Great job with the article as usual, and another one from the Barbra Streisand series. Have some fun with my comments;  On hold for 7 days! Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:45, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

• Cartoon network freak – I also finished this one. Thank you very much for your time. Carbrera (talk) 20:47, 9 September 2017 (UTC).

Gladly passing this! Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:38, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.