Talk:Michael Q. Schmidt

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2008Articles for deletionKept
October 19, 2008Articles for deletionNo consensus
February 18, 2009Articles for deletionKept

Honey And Thyme

edit

Thanks. But whatever H&T's story is, these articles should be notable in their own right. I believe they are not--that's just my opinion, which is not based on any affiliation to H&T (though I am a great fan of honey and of thyme, especially when coupled with a rack of lamb). Thanks again for your note, Drmies (talk) 02:56, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

striking my comments

edit

hey if nobody objects would it be ok if i struck my comments on the majority of this page? they're lengthy, distracting and offtopic and i don't really care about most of the points i raised anymore. also if all that's ok, i'll wipe this section too. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 03:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

You can always strike your own comments, at any time. I'd recommend though that you leave this section as a record of your decision to do so. Franamax (talk) 05:42, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
And by "strike" I assume you mean to use the strike-through feature. Franamax (talk) 05:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cumulus, can you copy and do a mock-up in a sandbox? My own contributions here amount to this thread. It seems to come down mostly to you, BQ and MQS. I agree that large parts of the discussion are not related to the article and would be better consigned to an archive or removed - but you would need to get their agreement, removing only your own edits just wouldn't work, since the threads are back-and-forth. Maybe though you could propose a scaled-down version that would contain only the "improving the article" bits. Franamax (talk) 07:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have myself moved the whole kit and kaboodle to storage so I may always have a reminder of my beginnings on Wiki... the good and the bad. If an Admin can move the page's history to the sandbox as well, so that it will never be thought I modified any of the contents after it was stored, and if BQ is amenable, I would then be agreeable to having a neutral Admin remove such portions of the discussions as he/she deemed irrelevent to the talk page. With respects CC, it might be best if someone independent of the page does the removal, as we all have too much "history" here. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 08:00, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cumulus Clouds, just archive all the old stuff, lengthy, distracting and offtopic posts included. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:49, 21 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Michael Q. Schmidt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)Reply