Talk:Osmaniye
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Osmaniye article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Comments
editFact and not rumor
edit- It is stated that; Many people in Turkey still feel that Osmaniye should not have been made a province. Now, this seems like a personal opinion. Such opinions unless supported by serious surveys must be avoided in the atricles. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 12:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Osmaniye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110119201339/http://dmi.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?m=OSMANIYE to http://www.dmi.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?m=OSMANIYE
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110824141105/http://www.dmi.gov.tr/en-US/forecast-cities.aspx?m=OSMANIYE to http://www.dmi.gov.tr/en-US/forecast-cities.aspx?m=OSMANIYE
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)