edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.todayszaman.com/national_criticized-for-lavishness-ak-saray-may-make-it-to-guinness-records_361924.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 11:48, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Maybe, rather than spending the time writing the above, could you not have spent the time just editing and rewording the offending content in order to remove the copyright issue? Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 22:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 23 January 2015

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title, although the article has been moved to Presidential Palace, Ankara in the meantime. Number 57 13:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)Reply



Cumhurbaşkanlığı SarayıAk Saray – The page was moved here on 6 November 2014. The new name might be official but certainly isn't the most common name in Turkish language, let alone English language publications. It is completely uncomprehensible and impossible to spell out for non-speakers of Turkish. Therefore I propose moving the article back to Ak Saray. PanchoS (talk) 00:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Then the better English name is "Presidential Palace (Turkey)". I'm for current name, or the English name--Ex13 (talk) 18:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Um, okay... without giving any argument, you moved the page rightaway. Still, your proposal doesn't seem to be better. It is quite ambiguous as Çankaya Köşkü has been the presidential palace from 1921 until October 2014.
Now, national as well as international press refers to the new palace as Ak Saray more often than not, so please raise your arguments against Ak Saray and bring a better proposal. --PanchoS (talk) 00:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 16 July 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus even after relisting. — JFG talk 17:26, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


Presidential ComplexPresidential Palace, Ankara – Official name or not, I seriously doubt "Presidential Complex" is WP:COMMONNAME for this palace in English-language publications. Neither is it unambiguous, as "Presidential complex" is occasionally used for other presidential palaces as well, see the references to "presidential complexes" in India, Israel, Somalia, Yemen. -- PanchoS (talk) 13:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. No such user (talk) 14:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC) --Relisting.JFG talk 22:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment: If we are to change this name I would recommend Presidential Complex of Turkey since there's only one presidental house in Turkey. Also, there are some examples where Turkish name is used (like Kızılay Meydanı, not "Kızılay Square"). If this is the case, then we can use Cumhurbaşkanlığı Külliyesi. In another option, Külliye loosely translated as complex, thus we can use Presidential Külliye.--Joseph (talk) 17:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 3 January 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 08:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply



Presidential ComplexPresidential Complex (Turkey) – Requesting move of "Presidential Complex" to "Presidential Complex (Turkey)", I think that the title page is too ambiguous and synonymous with Presidential palace. Although Google results show this particular place, I think that synonymous terms should be redirected unto that particular article. PyroFloe (talk) 15:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Oppose A hatnote would solve this problem, if it exists. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

About the Source of Room Number Information

edit

I would like to discuss the information on the information card, which is stated under the heading "Complex", that the building has 1150 rooms.

There are two links to websites that refer to the relevant sentence in which the phrase is used. They are deprecated as of 7/8/2021, but when checked with the Wayback Machine we see that they have been registered in the past. When I examined the news in the records, I could not see any information about the number of rooms. I ask the editor of the page or the users who have knowledge about this subject to join the discussion. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaskiier (talkcontribs) 18:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply