Talk:Swissôtel

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Swissôtel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091019235316/http://www.swissotel.com:80/EN/About+Us/management/petra-goetting.htm to http://www.swissotel.com/EN/About+Us/management/petra-goetting.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070913032145/http://www.swissotel.com:80/about_swissotel/corp_social_resp.htm to http://www.swissotel.com/about_swissotel/corp_social_resp.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:35, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

name

where does the name come from? this needs to be included.68.150.86.232 (talk) 19:27, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Isn't it obvious? "Swiss" = From Switzerland. "ôtel" from "hotel" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.240.147.36 (talk) 23:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Swissôtel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120720103623/http://www.swissotel.com/EN/Home to http://www.swissotel.com/EN/Home

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Paolo Guerrero Case (NPOV and relevance)

I doubt the relevance of the "Paolo Guerrero case" because it is not the first complaint against the hotel (it is common for hotels to receive complaints). The sanction imposed on Guerrero is relevant for the Peruvian soccer player and his team, but it is not necessarily relevant for the history of the hotel. This section of the article is based in the opinion of the soccer player and his lawyers. Is it really necessary to include the opinion of customers in the article? Moreover, there isn’t a current lawsuit against Swissôtel. On the other hand, this section of the article only includes the opinions and claims from Guerrero and his lawyers. Where is the side of the story of the hotel? The lack of NPOV is obvious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bw1939 (talk • contribs) 05:59, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

I agree it seemed to take up a disproportionate amount of the article. Also, much of this section was about decisions by the court that were unrelated to the hotel. I have trimmed this section down and tried to make it more neutral in its statements. --Mgp28 (talk) 16:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)