Talk:Tiger's eye

Gemology and Jewelry: Gemstones Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Gemstones subpage.

Rocks and minerals Low‑importance

	Earth sciences portal Tiger's eye is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Rocks and mineralsWikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsTemplate:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsRocks and minerals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Images

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Seems we have an abundance of good images in the article. I have removed the recently added 3-D image gallery as 3-d pics of a couple of polished pebbles really don't add to the article. If we need 3-d images, it should be of something with dimensional interest. Vsmith (talk) 23:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC) Hi Vsmith, the dimensional interest is in the visibility of chatoyancy because of the 3D. To see the 3D you need to cross your eyes till you see 3 images, and than you need to focus on the middle image. great articles btw. Ronveron — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronveron (talk • contribs) 20:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Links to more images?

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are a few nice Tiger's Eye images on the Chatoyancy page; maybe not a good idea to just add them in here (too many images), but should there be links to them? I'm not finding any pages that say "for more images, see whatever" ... or is there a way to make a link to show all relevant images? — Mwr0 (talk) 20:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

It would probably be best to insert a notice that there are more images available at WikiCommons. I'll do that in few minutes. • Astynax ^talk 02:07, 17 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Infobox

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We need more info about Tiger's eye in the Infobox. If anyone has more info about tiger's eye that could be added to the Infobox, please add it to the Infobox.Punk4orchrist (talk) 14:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply