Template:Did you know nominations/Donald R. Hickey
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 06:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Donald R. Hickey
- ... that American historian Donald R. Hickey was referred to as "the dean of 1812 scholarship" by The New Yorker? Sources: • Wayne State College, Biography; • Encyclopedia.com
- Reviewed:
QPQ PendingTemplate:Did you know nominations/Tamper (nuclear weapon)
- Reviewed:
Created by Gwillhickers (talk). Self-nominated at 03:06, 19 August 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Biggest issue that there are apparent plagiarism issues that must be remedied, per this Earwig check. Most of the detected "potential plagiarism" are just the names of books, so that can be ignored. But there are also segments of prose that are identical to other publications, and that cannot be ignored.
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
QPQ: 
Overall: 
In addition to prose that is identical to other segments, I have other comments. It is unclear to me what the QPQ situation is. Also, the hook needs some reformatting (bolding of the article being discussed, as well as italicization of The New Yorker). Issues exist with the article, for instance, the "publications" and "journals" sections do not seem to be formatted in a manner standard to Wikipedia articles. SecretName101 (talk) 15:15, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- As you know most of the identical prose involved titles of awards, books and simple general phrases. However, I have edited other text that had some identical prose. Have italicized the quote in question. The article name in the hook is already bolded. The Publications section lists the various publication in simple list format, using 'cite book' templates, which is very common in WP articles, esp in the bibliographies of many FA and GA history articles. At 2912 KB of "readable prose", the article is long enough. Will satisfy my QPQ requirements asap. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 21:52, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- QPQ review completed :Template:Did you know nominations/Tamper (nuclear weapon) -- Gwillhickers (talk) 18:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- @SecretName101: updates? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 08:07, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Need to check copyright again, once I get on my laptop. SecretName101 (talk) 14:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- @SecretName101: Any update on this? jp×g 19:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- After a close look using Earwig at copyright, I do not see any identical prose (all similarities detected appear to be appropriate, such as book titles). Approved
SecretName101 (talk) 20:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
