{{Multiple issues| {{Template:Very long}} {{Template:Lead too long}} {{Template:Overly detailed}}}}

  • Feel free to experiment on this page, but please refrain from insults and other non-polite expressions
  • This page will be wiped clean occasionally by me (Arnoutf), that's why it is called Sandbox

Arnoutf

{{{1}}} edits

NameLifespanReign startReign endNotesFamilyImage
William I
  • the Silent
  • Willem I
(1533-04-24)24 April 1533 – 10 July 1584(1584-07-10) (aged 51)26 July 158110 July 1584[1]Orange-Nassau 
Maurice
  • Maurits
(1567-11-14)14 November 1567 – 23 April 1625(1625-04-23) (aged 57)158523 April 1625son of William I[2]Orange-Nassau 
Frederick Henry
  • Frederik Hendrik
(1584-01-29)29 January 1584 – 14 March 1647(1647-03-14) (aged 63)23 April 162514 March 1647son of William I[3]Orange-Nassau 
William II
  • Willem II
(1626-05-27)27 May 1626 – 6 November 1650(1650-11-06) (aged 24)14 March 16476 November 1650son of Frederick Henry; no succession (First Stadtholderless Period)[4]Orange-Nassau 
William III
  • Willem III
(1650-11-04)4 November 1650 – 8 March 1702(1702-03-08) (aged 51)4 July 16728 March 1702son of William II; a.k.a. king William III of England and Ireland and king William II of Scotland; no succession (Second Stadtholderless Period)[5]Orange-Nassau 
William IV
  • Willem IV
(1711-09-01)1 September 1711 – 22 October 1751(1751-10-22) (aged 40)1 September 171122 October 1751son of John William Friso (from the Frisian brench)[6]Orange-Nassau
William V
  • Willem V
(1748-03-08)8 March 1748 – 9 April 1806(1806-04-09) (aged 58)22 October 175119 January 1795son of William IV, deposed by the Batavian Revolution; succeded by his son king William I after the French periodOrange-Nassau 
Pilgrims finishing the Camino 1985-

Green bars are holy years


PvdACDAVVDPvdACDAVVD

Bla

Dutch Rijksmonument number: 36075[1]

Arnoutf (talk) 18:53, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Problematic use of talk page by creating huge, interrelated threads making it impossible for occasional editors to comment (and being told off as the argument is made in some other thread)
  • Hostile and incivil reaction of Communicat against every editor who does not agree with his points
  • POV bias by claiming that marginal (if not fringe) minority sources sould be considered with equal attention as mainstream sources (note we are talking about the overview article of WWII, a conflict that has resulted in literally millions of publication if not more publications, so we simply have no space for all minority views). And I realise this is the exact opposite of the primary issue claimed by Communicat.
  1. ^ Stadtholder of Holland, Zeeland and Utrecht (1559–1584), Stadtholder of Friesland and Overijssel (1580–1584), all stadtholders after William I were drawn from his or his brother's descendants.
  2. ^ Stadtholder of Holland and Zeeland (1585–1625), Utrecht, Guelders and Overijssel (1590–1625), Groningen (1620–1625)
  3. ^ Stadtholder of Holland, Zeeland, Utrecht, Guelders, and Overijssel (1620–1625), Groningen and Drenthe (1640–1647)
  4. ^ Stadtholder of Holland, Zeeland, Utrecht, Guelders, Groningen, Drenthe and Overijssel
  5. ^ Stadtholder of Holland, Zeeland, Utrecht and Overijssel (1672–1702), Guelders (1675–1702), Drenthe (1696–1702)
  6. ^ William III died childless and the patrilineal ancestry of Orange-Nassau became extinct. In contrast to other provinces of the Dutch Republic, Friesland, Groningen and Drenthe had mostly drawn stadtholders from the House of Nassau, comprising in addition a matrilineal ancestry with the house of Orange-Nassau. Willem IV was hereditary stadtholder of Friesland (1711–1747), Holland, Zeeland, Utrecht and Overijssel (April/May 1747 – November 1747), stadtholder of Groningen (1718–1747), Guelders and Drenthe (1722–1747) and formally voted the first hereditary stadtholder of the United Provinces (1747–1751).