Welcome!

edit

Hello, Azerifactory, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Glasgow Al-Furqan Mosque, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! smileguy91Need to talk? 15:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Glasgow Al-Furqan Mosque

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Glasgow Al-Furqan Mosque requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. smileguy91Need to talk? 15:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nazim Babayev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azerbaijani. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Uzeyir Novruzov

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Uzeyir Novruzov, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.circopedia.org/index.php/Uzeyir_Novruzov.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:33, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Missy Malone CSD

edit

Hello,

Just noting that I've declined your CSD. It fails all 3 of the criteria specified, although you might wish to try and clean it up, or potentially nominate it for deletion via the WP:CSD or WP:PROD proceses. NativeForeigner Talk 09:29, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uzeyir Novruzov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qaraqoyunlu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amal Azzudin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Record. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fuad Alakbarov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page STV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Europe Sees Syria, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Maipu and Cantagalo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fuad Alakbarov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NHS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mimi Ikonn for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mimi Ikonn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimi Ikonn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Black Kite (talk) 18:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. I don't believe you may blank it.Xx236 (talk) 11:57, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Warning

edit

This is your only warning. If you file any more frivolous SPIs like Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Black Kite and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zebras234, you risk being blocked for disruptive editing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mogadishu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ONU. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Azerifactory. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ANI notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Insult. on behalf of Geograf22 -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 08:14, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Azerifactory. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Fuad Alakbarov

edit

Hi, I'm Brustopher. Azerifactory, thanks for creating Fuad Alakbarov!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi Azerifactory. I'm tagging this article for COI, because it seems from the previous deletion discussion that you have in the past stated that you are the subject of this article. Please read WP:COI for further information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Brustopher (talk) 11:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Brustopher:, I'm aware that article is previously deleted. But this person is currently representing Scotland at FIDE tournament and also have a verified account. I think he is far more than encyclopedic.--Azerifactory (talk) 13:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
You've misunderstood my point. I'm not saying the article is non-notable and should be deleted. I'm pointing out that you have a self-disclosed conflict of interest, and should not be editing, let alone creating a page like this, in such a manner. Brustopher (talk) 16:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
OK.--Azerifactory (talk) 16:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Aydinsalis SPI

edit

Hi. Last November, you filed two SPI reports in which you claimed Aydinsalis was engaged in sockpuppetry. No action has been taken so far on your reports because you were asked to supply further details but failed to do so. Specifically, Sro23 asked you, on 20 November 2017, to provide "diffs" to support your claims — as required by the "Evidence is required" rule for sockpuppet investigations — but you never did this.

Additionally, the bulk of your complaints against Aydinsalis appear to be connected to his activities on the Azerbaijani Wikipedia — but you submitted your complaint on the SPI page of the English Wikipedia. The various language editions of Wikipedia are separate, unrelated projects, and the admins and SPI clerks for the English Wikipedia do not have any authority to investigate or deal with sockpuppetry or other inappropriate activity on the Azerbaijani Wikipedia.

Please go promptly to the Aydinsalis SPI page (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Aydinsalis) and supply specific "diffs" illustrating why you believe the various users you mentioned (Garabekir, Abutalub, Axshamov, Geograf22, and the IP address 158.181.42.102) are in fact controlled by Aydinsalis as sockpuppets on the English Wikipedia. If you do not do this within the next 1–2 days, your SPI report will most likely be closed as incomplete, and no action will be taken. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 01:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rufet Turkmen

edit

Hello, I read your note on his talk page. I'd like to unblock him, but there may be a WP:CIR issue because his English skills may not be sufficient. English is not an easy language to learn. Can you help me here with this? Can you help him understand what I'm trying to say? -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Azerifactory. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Migrant Voice

edit

Hello Azerifactory,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Migrant Voice for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 02:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Fuad Alakbarov for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fuad Alakbarov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuad Alakbarov (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 13:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Azerbaijani contemporary art

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Azerbaijani contemporary art requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:04, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Angela McCormick

edit
 

The article Angela McCormick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable activist, only references are either trivial or closely aligned with the subject i.e. the Socialist Worker.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 01:26, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply