Deletion of section

edit

First, because the Two-Face incident was about the choice of wording in the plot section over his fate. It wasn't a general discussion about Two-Face, but about why a particular choice of words was given. I do agree that that boiled out of control as well, especially since the current wording was decided well before "section 1", "section 2", "section 3", "section 4" and "section 5" ever were created. It seemed people wanted to continue to debate how we should write his fate in the article, even after it was decided in a neutral manner.

With the Joker's scars, the very first comment in the section was not about the article but about facilitating conversation about what we (editors and fans) thought about the Joker's scars. Twice the section was attempted to be redirected to more appropriate discussion, and each time it failed. After your comment I removed the section to remove the temptation to continue the discussion. With Two-Face, I was absent for most of that banter and didn't read it. I left a comment in "section 2", and then didn't come back again until the last section to say "This was decided a while ago, why are we still talking about it?"

But, the talk page is archived every day and it will eventually be removed by the bot.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 20:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Indiana Jones Fedora

edit

I've replied here. -- MISTER ALCOHOL T C 03:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Indiana Jones WikiProject Now Open!

edit

I have finally created a WikiProject for Indiana Jones! Check it out. -- MISTER ALCOHOL T C 21:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dushku as Buffy

edit

If you look at the edit summaries in the article's history, you will see that yes, that is the reason. It was decided here that a one episode body swap, while an interesting plot twist for an episode, was not notable enough for mention in either the articles' infoboxes or lede sections. kingdom2 (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Thanks

edit

You're most certainly welcome Medleystudios72, thanks for your message! Have yourself a great day, and happy editing. :)  -- WikHead (talk) 13:25, 18 May 2012 (UTC)Reply