- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC (talk) 20:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sirohiwada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A google search for this place only turns up Wikipedia mirrors, so I think there is not (at least in English) any coverage in secondary sources. Taknaran (talk) 14:48, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Lack of sufficient coverage, I couldn't trace sources others than this sole articles' mirror. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 21:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Does not meet notability criteria; perhaps it is a small neighborhood, but without any established notability.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Searching for sources throws up only circular sources. This appears to be a small colony/locality/neighborhood in Udaipur, unlikely to be notable as an independent geographic entity. Abecedare (talk) 01:42, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.