Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Caraffe, Armand-Charles - Metellus Raising the Siege.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2015 at 15:30:29 (UTC)

Original – Metellus Raising the Siege by Armand-Charles Caraffe

Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 15:30, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain - Great painting. And I am not sure a "political" reason is useful for images, but I do not feel that a war theme, which may be interpreted in unpredictable ways, is the type art that the world needs more of now . . . from Wikipedia. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 15:43, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - If you're nominating an image to represent the artist, please choose one which is the most representative. The greater the number of articles nominated/featured, the less EV each individual image has. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you find this rule? please show me and link it. Paintings and photos evaluate here individually not for each painter just one work! Alborzagros (talk) 15:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are nominating several paintings by the same artist which do not have EV in and of themselves, but as representations of the artist's style. One painting is sufficient for that. WP:FP? requires an image to "Add significant encyclopedic value to an article and helps readers to understand an article."; "significant" is negated when there are multiple images showing much the same thing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:57, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Crisco 1492 _ Please show me rule in [1] and type or highlight where is written. Alborzagros (talk) 06:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've already quoted the rule. If you are unable to accept that, that's not my problem. Down below, J. Milburn has already explained my position as well. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I didn't mention the text in quotation mark (above) is from WP:FP. I thought that is your words. any way ... This painting Adds significant encyclopedic value to article, Armand-Charles Caraffe (painter) and helps readers to understand that article. HOW? Blow the painting in the article we can see this words:«Metellus raising the siege, now at the Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg.» then now we can find out that:

One of Armand-Charles Caraffe's painting is about Metellus raising the siege.
It has been maintained in Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg. So reply my question:

Don't two items above add significant encyclopedic value to painter's article?
Don't two items above help readers to understand painter's article?

Oppose As per two paintings below and Crisco. Mattximus (talk) 13:18, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question Which Metellus is this, anyway, and by the same token, which battle? Samsara 15:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]