Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Taj Mahal

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 May 2014 at 15:37:44 (UTC)

Replacement

Replacement 2

Reason: The image is one of the most used Indian images but a high-quality one. The resolution is very low when compared to another monument FPs. The replacement is better in all other aspects.
Articles this image appears in: Taj Mahal, Agra, 100+
Previous nomination/s

Delist or Delist and Replace as nominator — The herald 15:37, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Replacing an FP with an obviously inferior image is insulting. Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well in that case, you can hit for a delist. The image is par below current FP status. The herald 09:03, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When you have a candidate that is better then I'll consider it in a D&R. Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Saffron. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:44, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. Frankly, I don't rate either. Surely we can ask for a better picture of the Taj Mahal? J Milburn (talk) 08:35, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I agree with J Milburn's comment above: neither of these photos is an example of a very high quality image of the Taj Mahal. Nick-D (talk) 11:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Two FPs at Commons of the Taj Mahal: File:Taj Mahal N-UP-A28-a.jpg, File:Taj Mahal Sunset.jpg -- these might be good candidates for nomination here. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:17, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - File:Taj Mahal Sunset Edit1.jpg is already featured here; it's an edit of one of the images you linked to. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 13:31, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Not up to current standards, and a much better photo is already featured here. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:40, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]