Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 310

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Hut 8.5 in topic serial expat
Archive 305←Archive 308Archive 309Archive 310Archive 311Archive 312→Archive 315

Darlo Rocks (Radio Station)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Not sure why this page was deleted as it describes a new type of radio station that has an open door policy to bands and musicians to have their music aired via internet radio and to have their local gigs reviewed and publicised. —Philo694 (talk) 05:49, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user JzG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:04, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Sid Nelson (basketball player)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Ad strater (talk) 05:15, 30 June 2018 (UTC) living person professional player currently playing in NBA Summer League for Orlando Magic

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sid Nelson (basketball), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hut 8.5 07:37, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Art Of Illusion (software)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Peteihis, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peteihis (talk) 07:26, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:7 Seconds: A Typical Teenager, Atypical Life

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Atul Kaushal 07:44, 30 June 2018 (UTC)7 Seconds: A Typical Teenager, Atypical Life

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I restored Draft:7 Seconds: A Typical Teenager, Atypical Life, But I think this is not a suitable topic for an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:36, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Homestead Air Reserve Base

Latest comment: 6 years ago9 comments6 people in discussion

All other pages for US Air Reserve Bases exist, and there was plenty of information in the page that was compliant with Wikipedia's terms. In addition, it seems out of place for such a significant article to be deleted without a trace of it remaining. —Cocodog98 (talk) 23:28, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Cocodog98: You're going to have to talk to the deleting admin Buckshot06 (talk · contribs) about that. The deleted article is well put together with many contributors, but apparently it was rife with copyright violations added over a long period, as far as I can tell. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:55, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
This article was part of a large-scale copyright violation of offline sources by now-departed user Bwmoll3. See User_talk:Bwmoll3#Copyright_concerns and Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20130819, as per the deletion summary. All content will have to be rewritten from scratch to avoid potential copyright legal liability. Other USAF articles on that list of thousands of articles may be deleted at any time; many other USAF base articles have been deleted. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
I have had this issue before in relation to Vietnam War air bases and raised it at Milhist here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 145#Potential deletion of USAF/RAF pages.CCI Policy states that Accepted cases will lead to a contributor survey... If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately, in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. When such indiscriminate removal may be controversial or cause considerable collateral damage, an effort will be made to assemble a volunteer force sufficient to evaluate problematic contributions. If insufficient volunteers are available to manage clean-up, presumptive wholesale removal may be the only choice As the indiscriminate removal apparently caused considerable collateral damage as it apparently was "well put together with many contributors" was an effort... made to assemble a volunteer force sufficient to evaluate problematic contributions in relation to Homestead Air Base? Mztourist (talk) 10:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
@Buckshot06: Bwmoll3 didn't actually start that article, his first edits to it were made in December 2006, at which point it was nearly a year old. Would you be OK with restoring the edit history prior to that point? There is some information there which isn't in the recreated version. Hut 8.5 21:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
@Cocodog98: I have restored the early non-copyvio history, including two edits by the blocked user that just inserted a photo and an infobox. You may want to retrieve them from the history. I have also restored the infoboxes and lead images from the deleted history. There were several other photos in the article also. I have restored them as a gallery in the article. Prune as you see fit. Hope that helps. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:49, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Seems this has been fixed before I've been able to return to it. Endorse Anachronist's actions, thankyou. I do note that even the note in the edit box in this page specifically rules out copyright violations being undeleted. Buckshot06 (talk) 17:43, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
@Buckshot06: Can the bibiliography also be restored as well so that expansion is made easier? Kges1901 (talk) 11:13, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
I'll do so, but I doubt there's any Homestead-specific items, just the boilerplate books Bwmoll3 copied out of right across Stateside USAF bases. Buckshot06 (talk) 11:17, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Self-Aware Computing

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I, Licabettus, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Licabettus (talk) 11:03, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

I merged the history with the draft. We should have just one version of the article, not copies in two different name spaces. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:25, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

I, Licabettus, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Licabettus (talk) 11:04, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Please see the history for the versions that were in main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:25, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

List of Kappa Alpha Order chapters

Latest comment: 6 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

Active discussion between AFD proposer and myself regarding ways in what it would take to upgrade —Naraht (talk) 19:07, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Continue discussing it with them and the deleting administrator. If those talks peter out, WP:Deletion review is going to be your next port of call. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Jéské Couriano I contacted the administrator who closed the AFD before I came here and he said that he didn't do that and suggested that I come here. See User_talk:Naraht#List_of_Kappa_Alpha_Order_chapters .Naraht (talk) 15:10, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Until Sandstein clarifies what he expects to happen when he refers someone to this page, we won't overturn an AFD decision. I've pinged him on your talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
@Naraht:   Done. Now that Sandstein has responded, I have restored the article to Draft:List of Kappa Alpha Order chapters. Don't move it back to main space until the problems identified in the AFD have been unquestionably addressed. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:48, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
@Anachronist: Given that the the primary deletion reason was WP:NOTDIRECTORY #7 , I await Sandstein letting me know exactly what he thinks would improve it to the point where it isn't a directory any more. I never got that information specifically.Naraht (talk) 01:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
@Naraht: That isn't how it works. Please understand that an admin doesn't close an AFD and delete the article because he agrees with deletion. He does it because there was a consensus (even a small one) of deletion arguments grounded in Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Sanstein likely doesn't have an opinion. I suggest you query others who participated in the AFD. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:59, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

M-Studio

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Deepikadhikari, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Deepikadhikari (talk) 09:34, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

  Not done. That wasn't deleted under WP:G13, it was deleted as unambiguous promotion under WP:G11. There is no value to the Wikipedia project in restoring such things. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:00, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Earth Atlantis

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Reason for deletion was "G5. Creations by banned or blocked users", which is false, as I created the page —boogsley (talk) 22:13, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Av_LMKR

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Bigqluso (talk) 16:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Av LMKR

Draft:List of Katy Perry live performances

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, SNUGGUMS, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. At the very least, I would like to access its contents to I can paste into my sandbox if this isn't just regularly restored. Snuggums (talk / edits) 12:44, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:M-Studio

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Deepikadhikari, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Deepikadhikari (talk) 09:35, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Central Indiana Community Foundation

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Hoosier4philanthropy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hoosier4philanthropy (talk) 15:00, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Tim Bjorkman

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Tim Bjorkman is the Democratic candidate for South Dakota’s lone seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. The election is set for Nov. 6. He has been the subject of countless media reports and is a very active candidate for Congress. In addition, he served as a Circuit Court judge for more than a decade. It appears his page was deleted for political reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 26SDWriter (talk • contribs) 05:14, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Bjorkman, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ad Orientem (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:18, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
@26SDWriter I have taken a second look at the AfD and while not unanimous, I am satisfied that a rough consensus exists favoring deletion. As such I stand by my close. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:33, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Larry K. Hutcher

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Kaylynalexander, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kaylynalexander (talk) 20:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Would like to make edits, then publish —Kaylynalexander (talk) 20:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done It wasn't deleted in accordance with WP:G13, it was deleted per WP:G12 (copyright violation) and WP:G11 (promotion). As such it is ineligible for restoration. Start over from scratch. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:11, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Joseph L. F. Davis

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 192.131.39.175, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 192.131.39.175 (talk) 04:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr.

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr. (talk) 04:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC) I, Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr., request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13.

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr. (talk) 04:12, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Here's I got messages : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Bienvenido_Bones#Files_in_Category%3ABienvenido_Bones

And hopefully this will be not deleted, and here's the important story:

Robert J. Wickenheiser & Terrance Lindall, The Milton Projects Published on Jun 4, 2018 https://issuu.com/lindall/docs/robert_wickenheiser___terrance_lind

THE REVELATION OF ST. JOHN THE DIVINE Published on Aug 1, 2013 https://issuu.com/lindall/docs/st._john_the_divine_issuu_2_pdf

The Book of the Damned Published on Jan 2, 2014 https://issuu.com/lindall/docs/the_beast_of_bien_issuu_qaulity_pdf

THE SATANIC VERSES GOLD FOLIO Published on Jan 30, 2014 https://issuu.com/lindall/docs/september_2014_book_exhibit_issuu_q

THE NEW INTERNATIONAL SURREALIST MANIFESTO Published on Jun 8, 2013 https://issuu.com/lindall/docs/surrealist_manifesto_pdf

Terrance Lindall Retrospective Catalog Published on Nov 8, 2017 https://issuu.com/lindall/docs/terrance_20lindall_20retrospective_

Satanic Verses of Bones Banez, Part 2 Published on Jun 1, 2018 https://issuu.com/lindall/docs/satanic_verses_part_2


And I thanks from Master Terrance Lindall, we are doing art world collaboration from inspiration from Master John Milton's Paradise Lost and Sir William Blake and more on Judeo-Christian inspiration to enlighten our world prophecy and to gives through out the inspiration. And we combine the philosophical ideas from Sir Edmund Burke the Beautiful and Sublime. https://issuu.com/lindall

Sincerely your Brother Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr. Williamsburg Art & Historical Center Brooklyn, New York, U.S.A.

Draft:Jeffrey L. Citron

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I, Kaylynalexander, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kaylynalexander (talk) 20:20, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Atul Sharma (Actor)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Would like to revive the page —Anupamvarma (talk) 14:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Night Vision (Kayak album)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Seems rather unwise to randomly undiscussed PROD just one of this Dutch rock dinosaur's dozen albums simply because it was the only one that didn't chart. Dull but pointless to go making a hole in the discography. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Atul Sharma (Actor)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Anupamvarma, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Anupamvarma (talk) 14:33, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Rajatsubhra Majumdar

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Poet related all the informations are true. The references which is used to build the article are authentic —Aparajita Majumdar (talk) 04:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

The page is not yet deleted. Go to the afd page to argue about deleting. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:58, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

MatrackInc

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  Not done That page was an advertisement, that is not what Wikipedia is for. You have also been blocked, likely for terms of use violation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:49, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Oshkosh Steam Wagon

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Jelliott4, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jelliott4 (talk) 20:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:William Hood

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I want to finish the article —Boyageur (talk) 20:56, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Carlos Diego D'Andrea

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I am asking for assistance to restore the page Carlos Diego D'Andrea that was deleted via a deletion debate with only one participant other than the nominator. SM-signature (talk) 05:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

@Sunshine-Moonlight: first the templated response:
  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Carlo Diego D'Andrea (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
Now my response:
You really need to ask the deleting admin about this, since it wasn't closed as soft-delete, we can't restore it by request here. You might ask that it be restored to draft space.
Bear in mind that there were three involved: the nominator, the person who commented, and the admin. The delete comment was sufficiently detailed and well-argued that, had I seen that AfD, I would have considered it strong enough to close as delete. You will likely need to rebut the points given in that discussion before the article can be restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:05, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Update: I notice you already have a copy of the article in your sandbox, so there is no need to restore it to draft space. I suggest getting a third party review at WP:AFC. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:09, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Sivan Talmor

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Tabuhart, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tabuhart (talk) 04:18, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mitch Darrell

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) MitchDarrell3 (talk) 00:35, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. —C.Fred (talk) 00:40, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Stefon Rishel

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, TheMagnusOpus, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TheMagnusOpus (talk) 17:47, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Chakra (Japanese band)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Voltaigne, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Voltaigne (talk) 22:06, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Template:Search Wikipedia

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The template has some usefulness for certain situations and some pages including Userpages. —  BrandonALF  (talk) 19:38, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

@BrandonALF: Two things. First, there is a search box at the top of the page, so this isn't really that useful. Second, if it's useful, why did you request to have it deleted? —C.Fred (talk) 19:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

I meant to request a similar page I accidentally made in the main namespace for deletion.  BrandonALF  (talk) 19:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Abduttayyeb Hassanali

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I, 89.197.101.20, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 89.197.101.20 (talk) 12:19, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Well 89 I can't find that page. Can you please check the spelling? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:55, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
He omitted a word. I've fixed it. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:14, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Atlantis vessel

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Uanfala, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. – Uanfala (talk) 23:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Ravi Naimpally

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

G13 (I don't know if this draft should be deleted or not; I'm requesting undeletion so I can see the content). —Taku (talk) 05:48, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

G13s aren't an indictment of content or sourcing. They occur once a draft has been left unedited for six months. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:11, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
I know. But I still need undeletion so that I can see if the content are worth development. —- Taku (talk) 07:46, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:45, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft: Pamela Clark

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, SunnyBoi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SunnyBoi (talk) 14:44, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Ke Ma Timro Hoina Ra

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Sushilxxx (talk) 14:44, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Northwest Community Credit Union

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Working on this Wikipedia article for the credit union I work at and would like to have its formatting and tags so that I can republish the article to not be speedy-deleted. —Tagesreste (talk) 14:44, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Ivan De Battista

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Someone deleted this page erroneously. We wish to revert it please. —141.8.63.191 (talk) 14:52, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Catz 'n Dogz

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Tropicalpineapple, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tropicalpineapple (talk) 13:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Pals for Life

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This talk page was deleted, then undeleted, and now it has been deleted again. The article Pals for Life was mistakenly deleted as G7, and it has since been undeleted. The talk page should therefore be undeleted again so that it can display both a WikiProject and an AfD notice if the AfD is closed as "keep". —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:30, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

  Done I didn't do the undelete, but I'm noting here that it's been done. —C.Fred (talk) 20:30, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Rigby's Water World

Latest comment: 6 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

Hi, there was an AFD about this incomplete, under-construction water park which was reasonably closed "delete". However it really does seem to be opening soon, and I would like to be able to expand the article in Draft-space and ready it for move to mainspace when it has opened and there is clearly substantial coverage. There is this recent NBC local station coverage about it nearing opening. Could it be restored to Draft:Rigby's Water World or to my userspace, please? --Doncram (talk) 23:38, 28 June 2018 (UTC) —Doncram (talk) 23:38, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

@Sandstein: You deleted this. Any objection to draftifying? ~Anachronist (talk) 05:18, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
I'd like to record stuff into the article, like this June 22 13-WMAZ news station coverage. I think Sandstein who deleted this has chosen not to answer. Perhaps they didn't want to get into a thing about it, given a disagreement about a different AFD which is being discussed elsewhere (and a factor in me asking here rather than asking them to do me a favor). Anyhow I am an experienced editor and I, not anyone else, would be accountable about moving it to mainspace when it is substantially different than the version AFDd. Given that it was deleted, I would tend to be conservative about doing so. But this is getting ridiculous to withhold access to the content from me or anyone else. --Doncram (talk) 22:03, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Administrator Sandstein states here, about a different request, that they do not do refunds themself, and they refer requestors to wp:REFUND. --Doncram (talk) 19:19, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
I am still interested in receiving the article. --Doncram (talk) 16:30, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! Just in time, too... the park has now opened, so CHRYSTALLBALL complaint goes away, and there may be sufficient coverage for it to be mainspaced now or soon. --Doncram (talk) 01:00, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Amanda Scarborough

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article was deleted back in 2009 by NuclearWarfare for these reasons:

...non-notable college athlete, fails WP:ATHLETE, not competed at the highest level, no reliable sources to show notability.

If this article were about the former softball player turned ESPN broadcaster Amanda Scarborough, that rationale is incorrect, because Scarborough has won National Fastpitch Coaches Association All-American awards twice during her college career [1]. Additionally, the Big 12 Conference, a major NCAA Division I athletic conference, named her its Softball Player of the Year in 2005 [2]. Those awards alone should be enough for Scarborough to meet WP:NCOLLATH.

After graduating from college, Scarborough went on to be a softball game commentator for ESPN [3] and has gotten outside media attention for her work there [4] [5] [6]. Even if she had not won those softball awards, her broadcasting career should be enough to meet WP:GNG.

I attempted to request undeletion directly with NuclearWarfare, but that user has not responded. —Arbor to SJ (talk) 04:32, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Ittle Dew 2

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Reason for deletion was "G5. Creations by banned or blocked users", which is false, as it was created by not a sock user same situation on Earth Atlantis — 49.148.166.172 (talk) 05:29, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Survive the Nights

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Lastly article req I'm pretty sure this is neither not created by a sock this is a long article donated by a creator of the article, which is not also created by a sock, invalid G5, same situation both on above. 49.148.166.172 (talk) 10 July 2018 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett: Draft:Survive the Nights (video game) this one is not created by a banned user can you revive this abandoned article? I will work with it, thanks in advance. 49.148.166.172 (talk) 10:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Only If (video game)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Which is also not created by a sock, another invalid G5 thing, same situation above. 49.148.166.172 (talk) 05:32, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Hereditarnia

Latest comment: 6 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion

Hereditarnia is a word with interesting origins and interpretation that represents a scientific community lasting for more than 20 years. It is worth to create an encyplopedic item for it. It is not an advertisement because the community and the research topic is non-profit. The item existed for many years and was visited by a number of readers that provided positive feedback. The aim of wikipedia is to promote and spread knowledge. —Gsem ke (talk) 07:11, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

This was not deleted as an advert, but for no claim of importance as an organisation. For this kind of delete, you should ask the admin user: Randykitty who deleted it. Perhaps it could be made into a draft until you find independent references to show the topic is notable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:16, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
It was tagged as A7 by Drmies and as I agreed with that assessment, I deleted it accordingly. I even thought this might be some joke, as the article start with saying that the word cannot be found in any dictionary. Anyway, if independent references exist (in the deleted version there's absolutely nothing), I wouldn't mind at all if someone would draftify this. --Randykitty (talk) 16:49, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
The argumentation concerning missing relevant sources is very non-professional and incorrect. At least the following reference Hereditarnia was provided. It is an article published in serious scientific journal indexed in many databases. You can suggest to change the text because it is, in your opinion, similar to webpage. However the argumentation must be professional and correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gsem ke (talk • contribs) 22:50, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
  Not done. The article as it stood is not appropriate for main article space, neither in tone (which was promotional), nor in significance (no credible claim of importance was given). I suggest you start over in draft space and submit the article for review via WP:AFC. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

From Your Grave

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Please userfy —Jax 0677 (talk) 20:59, 10 July 2018 (UTC) --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:59, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Namloyak

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The page is based on sources. I'd like to add new sources on his recent work as a tibetologist. —Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 22:50, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Namloyak, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ansh666 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mic check LIVE: Ms. Lauryn hill & Tyrese Gibson

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Ysl33, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ysl33 (talk) 04:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Radmila Lolly

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I am not sure why this page was deleted. I requested an edit review which featured all the suggested corrections. —Carlden10 (talk) 15:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Pangea

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This page had some deleted revisions (both redirects and non-redirects) that forgot to be restored. Talk:Pangea also had some deleted revisions that should be restored as well. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:04, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I suggest that you consult the restoreing admin user:Graham87, as 6 revisions were restored, it looks deliberately. The deleted stuff includes lots of redirects, some vandalism, and advert as well as quite a bit of disambiguation pages. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:00, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
  Done, both the article and talk page. Indeed, I simply forgot to restore the relevant revisions. @GeoffreyT2000:, thanks for bringing this here, but next time please notify me directly ... you'd have gotten a much quicker response that way. Thanks @Graeme Bartlett: for the ping. Graham87 16:09, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:The Queen Was in the Parlor

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I intend on working on it. Thanks. —The Duke of NonsenseWhat is necessary for thee?. 16:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Kunal Kamra

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The subject has gained more notability, I'll try to work on the subject "Publish changes" button below —Accesscrawl (talk) 14:43, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunal Kamra, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Play With Me (video game)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Not Created by a sock, it was created by very newbie user forcing 80.240.27.180 make another draft, merge can help. 49.148.252.4 (talk) 00:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Fiammetta_Venner

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Yasmineothman (talk) 15:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

  Not done, nothing to do. The article isn't deleted, and this isn't the place to contest deletion proposals. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:26, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Sher Khan 'Bahadur'

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Astore Malik (talk) 12:19, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

  Not done. This is a recreation of the deleted article Sher Khan (soldier), which was deleted as a result of a discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sher Khan (soldier), and is therefore ineligible for restoration by request. If any new information has arisen that addresses the concerns in the discussion, please take it up with Malcolmxl5 (talk · contribs), the deleting administrator. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Mariko Silver Portrait 2014.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, the page Mariko Silver Portrait 2014.jpg was incorrectly nominated for speedy deletion and deleted under the claim that it was an unambiguous copyright violation, however I got the image from the owner's flickr page where it is labeled as public domain and thus should be fine. The user who nominated it for deletion admitted the error on my talk page here —EMuller1 (talk) 16:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the response @Hut 8.5:, however on the talk page of the admin who deleted it, @Fastily:, it says do not post regarding a deletion... What should I do here? I am new to wiki and not sure how this works, if you can't revert the delete can I just post it again? I very clearly showed the public domain flickr source when I first posted it and still it was deleted incorrectly. Thanks! EMuller1 (talk) 17:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
@EMuller1: that's an interesting practice, admins are supposed to respond promptly to questions about their admin actions and justify them if necessary. We aren't supposed to restore pages deleted as copyright violations through this process though. Your best bet is probably deletion review. You are supposed to ask the deleting admin first but if the deleting admin doesn't want to be asked about deletions then you can skip that. Getting the deletion overturned would be preferable to uploading the file again. Hut 8.5 18:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
  Already doneFastily restored and moved it to File:Mariko Silver Portrait 2014 1.jpg. Fastily is saying he is busy in real life. Since he says to use REFUND, assume that the outcome from here will be undisputed. Since you reuploaded it to commons, that is actually a more suitable place anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:25, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Society for the Study of Behavioural Phenotypes

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Waiteje, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Waiteje (talk) 11:39, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Jimfbleak (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

FaunaDB

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I think there was a good spread of folks who contributed to the original draft, with citations, and couple of folks who liked the article as well —2607:FEA8:D1F:F8AA:1DB1:6056:252C:3FDC (talk) 05:53, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:D1F:F8AA:1DB1:6056:252C:3FDC (talk) 05:55, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. There wasn't a draft; the article was deleted from main article space. (Drafts are either going to be in a user's sandbox, or prefaced with "Draft:".) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

serial expat

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

was unable to work on it. Will do within the next weeks —Kbinschedler (talk) 15:43, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_310&oldid=1092746607"