The analog revival is a period in synthesizer history when analog synthesizers returned to commercial production and popular usage.
The revival has its roots in the late 20th century but began in earnest during the early 21st century, prompted by the release of several analog synthesizers by companies such as Korg and Moog. This followed a spell of companies producing digital synthesizers after the release of Yamaha's DX7, which was less expensive than analog synthesizers and led to many analog manufacturers going out of business in the 1980s. The emergence of electronic dance music in the late 1980s boosted the popularity of analog synthesizers on the second-hand market and created a demand for the resumed production that major manufacturers took until the early 21st century to capitalize on.
Background
editAnalog synthesizers have been produced since the 1960s, when American engineer Robert Moog created his Moog synthesizer. Synthesizers became widely popular with the release of the smaller and more affordable Minimoog in 1970, causing artists such as the Beatles, Rush, Lipps Inc. and Michael Jackson to begin using them. In 1983, Yamaha released the DX7 digital synthesizer, which was cheaper than its analog counterparts. Studios and producers increasingly used digital synthesizers over analog synthesizers into the late 1980s and 1990s,[1] causing many analog synthesizer companies, including Moog, ARP and Sequential Circuits, to go out of business.[2][3][4][5]
History
edit20th century: dance music revival
editDespite the boom in digital synthesizers and their effect on manufacturers, analog synthesizers maintained some relevance throughout the late 20th century. Second-hand synthesizers enjoyed a small amount of use in the during this period;[6] during the early 2000s this was still the case, despite the increasing availability of new analog synthesizers.[7]
The mainstream emergence of electronic dance music in the summer of 1988 contributed to an "evolution of analog synth aesthetics".[8] The movement heavily relied on analog synthesizers and drum machines created by the Roland Corporation several years prior. Roland's TR-808 and TR-909 drum machines and TB-303 bass synth were commercial failures at release due to their lack of realism, but were crucial to this new scene due to their ease of access.[8] Units of these machines were available for resale at low prices on both sides of the Atlantic, making them an attractive entry point for amateur musicians.[8][5] These instruments saw use in house, techno, hip-hop and other genres, creating a wider interest in analog synthesizers.[9] However, mainstream music was still using digital synthesizers and samplers during this period.[5] Analog synthesizer manufacturers were unable to capitalize on demand since most were out of business; those that remained had embraced digital synthesis and did not want to return to analog.[10]
In the 1990s, some companies tried to appeal to the growing demand by releasing virtual analog synthesizers. Roland released their JD-800 in 1990: while digital, it marked a return to analog-like controls, oscillators and filters.[10] In 1993, American audio engineer and synth manufacturer Tom Oberheim released the Marion Systems MSR2, a rack-mount synthesizer with digitally controlled analog oscillators.[11] 1994 marked analog releases by Doepfer and Novation: the latter's Bass Station was one of many TB-303 inspired synthesizers released in this period.[12] Others entered the market towards the end of the century, with virtual analog offerings from Waldorf, Quasimidi and other smaller manufacturers appearing in lieu of major companies.[13]
21st century: mainstream revival
editThe revival began in earnest during the early 21st century;[14] its beginning is attributed to multiple events, including the release of the Minimoog Voyager in 2002 by the reformed Moog Music,[15] the release of the Korg Monotron in 2010[16][17] and the re-release of several vintage synthesizers.[18]
Modular synthesizers, specifically Eurorack, played a part in the revival by spurring major manufacturers to start making new analog synthesizers.[19] Trade shows such as the NAMM Show reported large increases in the number of modular synthesizers in 2015, when there was a 20% increase in synthesizer offerings at the show.[14] The manufacturing switch to surface-mount technology also contributed to the analog revival, as new synthesizers could be made faster for lower costs.[16] The mass production of small analog synthesizers was another factor, as previous designs suffered due to being costly and unwieldy.[20]
The revival began due to a number of perceived advantages that analog synthesizers have over their digital counterparts. Sound on Sound stated that one of these reasons was the imperfections present in the sound of an analog synthesizer, which can make the instrument feel less "sterile".[16] Tom Oberheim said that "there is a warmth to analog", and compared the analog–digital divide to LPs and CDs.[18][note 1] They also suggested that the simple layout and "one-knob-per-function" design help to make a better connection with the player.[15][16][22] Oberheim and US synth designer Dave Smith both theorized that the demand could be due to a cohort of younger musicians discovering analog synthesizers.[23] Steve Oppenheimer of Electronic Musician suggested that a factor was that musicians wanted digital and sample-based synthesizers over analog because they could emulate acoustic instruments better, but a new appreciation of analog by electronic musicians caused an "analog renaissance".[7]
As well as the production of new synthesizers, the analog revival has manifested in other ways. Vintage synthesizers are now being sold for large amounts due to demand from modern producers. Digital synthesizers are also beginning to display traits associated with analog, such as more hands-on controls.[24]
Notes, references and sources
editNotes
editReferences
edit- ^ Stefani 2022, p. 337.
- ^ Sherburne, Philip (2 February 2015). "Jacking Into the Past with the Vintage Synth Revival". Pitchfork. Retrieved 12 November 2023.
- ^ Mast, Lindsay Wolfgang (23 March 2023). Synthesizer comeback (Radio broadcast). World Radio. Retrieved 12 November 2023.
- ^ The Music Trades 2016, p. 82.
- ^ a b c Jenkins 2007, p. 194.
- ^ Doty, Marc (14 July 2016). "What's Behind The Resurgence of Analog Synthesizers?". Performer. Retrieved 11 August 2023.
- ^ a b Oppenheimer 2006, p. 10.
- ^ a b c Barlindhaug 2007, p. 79.
- ^ Barlindhaug 2007, p. 80.
- ^ a b Jenkins 2007, p. 197.
- ^ Jenkins 2007, p. 198.
- ^ Jenkins 2007, p. 199.
- ^ Jenkins 2007, p. 202–203.
- ^ a b Rodgers 2015, p. 5.
- ^ a b Boothroyd, David (13 August 2013). "Analogue electronics sees a revival in the music industry". New Electronics. Retrieved 11 August 2023.
- ^ a b c d "The Analogue Revival". Sound on Sound. March 2014. Retrieved 11 August 2023.
- ^ "So many synths, so little time". Mixdown. 10 March 2017. Retrieved 11 August 2023.
- ^ a b Lewis, Randy (21 January 2015). "The synth is back: KORG and Moog revive golden-era analog synthesizers". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 11 August 2023.
- ^ Boxer, Steve (8 July 2015). "The synth revival: why the Moog is back in vogue". The Guardian. Retrieved 11 August 2023.
- ^ Stefani 2022, p. 338.
- ^ Barlindhaug 2007, p. 78.
- ^ Vanhanen, Janne (29 December 2016). "Rewired – the Resurgence of Analog Sound Synthesis". Mustekala Kulttuurilehti. Retrieved 11 August 2023.
- ^ The Music Trades 2016, p. 84.
- ^ Pinch & Trocco 2002, p. 317.
Sources
edit- "An Analog Revival at NAMM". The Music Trades. 164 (2): 82–84. March 2016. ISSN 0027-4488.
- Barlindhaug, Gaute (2007). "Analog Sound in the Age of Digital Tools". In Lund, Niels Windfeld; Skare, Roswitha; Vårheim, Andreas (eds.). A Document (Re)turn. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. pp. 73–93. ISBN 9783631562949.
- Jenkins, Mark (2007). "Chapter 6: The Analog Revival". Analog Synthesizers. Elsevier. pp. 194–229. ISBN 9780240520728.
- Oppenheimer, Steve (June 2006). "The Analog Revival". Electronic Musician. 22 (6): 10. ISSN 0884-4720.
- Pinch, Trevor; Trocco, Frank (2002). Analog Days: the Invention and Impact of the Moog synthesizer. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674016170.
- Rodgers, Tara (October 2015). "Tinkering with Cultural Memory". Feminist Media Histories. 1 (4). University of California Press: 5–30. doi:10.1525/fmh.2015.1.4.5. eISSN 2373-7492.
- Stefani, Ewan (2022). "The Analogue Synthesizer: Classification, Design and Musical Potential". In Doğantan-Dack, Mine (ed.). Rethinking the Musical Instrument. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 337–359. ISBN 9781527577893.
External links
edit- Feature on MusicRadar