Wikipedia

Apple Daily raids and arrests

The offices of Apple Daily, once the largest anti-China newspaper in Hong Kong, and its parent company, Next Digital, were raided and executives arrested by the Hong Kong Police Force on 10 August 2020 and again on 17 June 2021. Some of the arrested and three companies of Next Digital were charged under the Hong Kong national security law. The 26-year-old newspaper was forced to close in June 2021 following the raids and freezing of its capital.

Apple Daily raids and arrests
A police cordon outside the Next Digital building on 10 August 2020
Native name 警方國安處搜查《蘋果日報》
Date10 August 2020 (2020-08-10) & 17 June 2021 (2021-06-17)
LocationTseung Kwan O Industrial Estate, New Territories, Hong Kong
Coordinates22°17′10″N 114°16′26″E / 22.2861116°N 114.2740238°E / 22.2861116; 114.2740238
TargetExecutives of Next Digital and Apple Daily
OutcomeApple Daily ceased operation on 24 June 2021 due to capital frozen by the authorities
ChargesCollusion with foreign forces, defraud

Background

edit

National Security Law

edit
Main article: 2020 Hong Kong national security law
 
Jimmy Lai in July 2019 during a meeting with U.S. Vice President Mike Pence regarding Hong Kong's pro-democracy protest, which was accused by pro-Beijing camp as colluding with foreign forces

Before Hong Kong national security law was imposed by the Beijing Government and officially promulgated by the Hong Kong Government on 30 June 2020, Jimmy Lai, the founder of Next Digital, was rumoured to be a target under the new law. Lai insisted on not leaving Hong Kong; during two interviews on 16 and 29 June he said that he was expecting to be jailed. He also vowed to fight until the last moment.[1]

First raid

edit
See also: HKSAR v Lai Chee Ying

Events

edit
 
Lai (second left, wearing white) was arrested in Homantin residence at 10 am on 10 August

In the morning on 10 August 2020, the National Security Department of the Hong Kong Police Force arrested founder of Next Digital Jimmy Lai. Four senior management staff of the company, CEO Cheung Kim-hung, CFO Royston Chow Tat-kuen, Administrative Director Wong Wai-keung, and Animation Director Ng Tat-kwong, were arrested on suspicion on conspiracy to commit fraud,[2] while Chow was also with the suspicion of collusion with foreign forces under the National Security Law.[3] Two sons of Lai were arrested also under the suspicion of collusion with foreign forces. Mark Simon, the adviser to Lai who was not in Hong Kong, was reportedly wanted by the police. He later confirmed on Twitter that Lai had been arrested under the national security law.[4]

 
Police waiting outside the office of Apple Daily

Nearly 200 police cordoned, raided, and searched the headquarters of Next Digital and Apple Daily in Tseung Kwan O Industrial Estate at 10 am after making arrests.[5] Ryan Law Wai-kwong, editor-in-Chief of Apple Daily, asked the cops to show the search warrant issued by the court. Apple Daily said such request was ignored,[5] but the Police Force later rejected such claim.[citation needed] The administrative Department of Apple Daily called the staff not to come to work due to unexpected situations.[6] Some journalists were prevented from picturing the office desk by the police, while those at the office had their personal information taken by the police. It was said the departments of local news, breaking news and finance news were raided.[7]

 
Lai was brought away by the police at around 1 pm

Handcuffed Lai was brought to the office at around 11 am. Chan Pui-man, Associate Publisher of Apple Daily, and Law insisted to monitor the raid and argued that the search warrant did not cover the news material, which was echoed by Steve Li Kwai-wah from the National Security Department,[8] although the police took away the materials and threatened to arrest two with suspicion of obstructing police officers.[9] Cheung, also handcuffed, arrived at noon. Lawyers were permitted to reach Lai and Cheung after negotiations with the police.[10][5] Editors while working and reporters were asked to leave the office,[11] blocked from taking photos of Cheung,[12] and were stopped from entering the editing department of the office.[13][non-primary source needed]

 
Fu Chun-chung, pro-Beijing activist, celebrated the arrest of Lai outside the office at around 3 pm

Lai and Cheung left the office at around 1 pm following three-hour raid in the office. Computers, mobile phones, details of the exiled activists and other evidences were said to be taken away.[14] Some pro-Beijing activists celebrated the raid outside the office.[15]

Controversies stirred as local and international reporters from RTHK, Stand News, Inmedia, AFP and Reuters were not allowed to enter press area, while media said to be pro-government were allowed in.[16]

On the same day, Hong Kong police also arrested three activists: Agnes Chow,[17] Wilson Li Chung-chak and Andy Li Yu-hin, and sent three officers with a court order to the Hong Kong office of The Nikkei who ran an advert paid for by pro-democracy activists in 2019.[18][19]

Reactions

edit

The unprecedented raid caused widespread controversy in the international community.

Hong Kong

edit
 
Hong Kong Journalists Association Yeung Kin-hing was interviewed following the raid
  • Chairman of Hong Kong Journalists Association Yeung Kin-hing described the raid as destroying press freedom in Hong Kong, shaping white terror in the city only to be seen in the Third World.[5]
  • The Next Digital Trade Union strongly condemned police operation saying it was extremely rare and severe in the history of Hong Kong. The Union criticized the search of news material as an abuse of power and to harass news media, and vowed to guard the post.[20]
  • Foreign Correspondents' Club stated the operation eroded the reputation of Hong Kong and signaled the end of press freedom in Hong Kong.[21]
  • Several groups from the media released joint statement, urging the police to elaborate on the aim and legal basis of this operation, or else the operation shall be suspended immediately.[22]
  • 22 Pro-democracy legislators strongly denounced the police as intimidating the media.[23] Now-exiled former legislator Nathan Law described the arrest operation as "crazy".[24]
  • Pro-Beijing DAB and FTU supported the police operation as to guard the national security.[25]

People's Republic of China

edit

Taiwan

edit
  • President Tsai Ing-wen strongly denounced the Hong Kong government of damaging press freedom, rule-of-law, human rights, and democracy, leading to a chilling effect within the media industry.
  • The Mainland Affairs Council denounced the "evil" actions by the Hong Kong government, believing such acts would only shame the international image of CCP and Hong Kong.[29]
  • Premier Su Tseng-chang urged CCP to keep the promise of 50-year pledge.[30]

United Kingdom

edit

United States

edit
  • In a tweet, U.S. Vice President Mike Pence described the arrest as offensive. Pence tweeted that the arrest of Jimmy Lai was "an affront to freedom-loving people around the world. He recalled his meeting with Lai at the White House and said he was encouraged by his insistence on democracy, rights and Beijing's commitment to giving Hong Kong people autonomy. And he said, "The United States will continue to stand with Jimmy Lai and all freedom-loving people of Hong Kong.[34]
  • U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the arrests proved that the Chinese government had "deprived" Hong Kong of its freedom. Pompeo tweeted, "I am deeply troubled by reports that Hong Kong arrested Jimmy Lai under the draconian national security law.", "Further proof that the Chinese Communist Party has already deprived Hong Kong of its freedoms and eroded the rights of its people.[34]
  • In a tweet, Republican Florida Senator Rick Scott falsely criticized the Chinese Communist Party for allegedly continuing to "silence and intimidate" those who speak out for democracy and human rights, adding that the Hong Kong national security law is a tool that directly infringes on Hong Kong's freedom and autonomy.[35]
  • Although Lai's pro-Trump position was shared by many in the Hong Kong pro-democracy camp, as well as Apple Daily, many democracy experts in the United States believe the position was the main reason the why Hong Kong's national security law was passed, and probably was one of the factors that led to the 2021 U.S. Capitol insurrection.[36]

Others

edit

Effects

edit

Volatile stock

edit

Following the news of Jimmy Lai arrested spread in the city, the stock of Next Digital was volatile as pledge to buy the stock emerged at the online forums. The stock plunged more than 15% after Lai arrested, but then surged nearly 280% in the afternoon,[44] becoming the stock with the best performance in the day.[45] The stock price, at peak, accumulated more than 2,000% of increase in 3 days only, but then plunged again.

Police arrested 15 people on suspicion of fraud and money-laundering on 10 September, insisting that the arrest operation only targeted the scam taking advantage of the Next Digital incident instead of the company.[46]

Purchase of newspaper

edit

Apple Daily supporters called for buying newspaper as to show support to the newspaper. The newspaper printed 350,000 copies for 11 August edition, and later raised the number to 550,000 in the early morning of the day, which is significantly higher than the normally 70,000 copies.[47] Queues were seen at the newspaper stalls.[48]

Second raid

edit

Events

edit
 
Cheung Chi-wai was taken away by police after searching for evidence
 
Inside one of the reporter desk after police raid

In the morning on 17 June 2021, the National Security Department of the Hong Kong Police Force arrested five Next Digital executives. They included the company's CEO Cheung Kim-hung, COO Royston Chow Tat-kuen, Apple Daily editor-in-chief Ryan Law, vice-president Chan Pui-man, and Next Animation Studio chief executive director Cheung Chi-wai.[49] Around 500 police officers and National Security Department officers went straight to the Apple Daily headquarters in Tseung Kwan O Industrial Estate, blocking off the building and all exits. All staff and persons entering the building must register with ID cards and staff cards, and are also required providing personal information such as telephone number and address, Li Kwai-wah, a senior Superintendent of the National Security Department of the police, also came to investigate. A police officer wearing a black vest at the scene said that after registration, all employees returning to the building could only leave or go to the restaurant on the 5th floor, and cannot enter other areas of the building. They also pointed out that they were searching for evidence at the scene to prevent reporters from returning to work, and that shooting was prohibited.[50]

Police asked reporter to leave the desk

edit

When the police arrived, there were about 20 employees in the Apple Daily building, including several reporters and cleaners. The police asked everyone to lay down their work and gather in the lobby on the second floor. The police then registered their ID cards and then asked them to stop work and leave, the reporter was asked to go to the staff restaurant on the 5th floor. During the period, a number of police officers randomly searched the documents on the reporter's desk and opened the cabinet, and asked the reporter to testify. However, the reporter claimed that the company lawyer could only read the documents after the company's lawyer arrived, and refused to assist in the search for evidence. The police officer immediately called the reporter to sit down. Low, and there was no positive response as to whether the evidence search will begin after the lawyer arrives. An agent turned on the reporter's computer to search for information. At present, all reporters in the building have been asked to leave the editorial department and wait in the underground space or on the 5th floor. They were unable to enter and exit the building freely. Police officers stepped forward to stop them. The reporter used a camcorder to film police officers during the search. It is reported that an employee's company phone placed on the desk on the second floor had a record of "being online" at 8 o'clock in the morning.[50]

Police arrests executives and searched the materials

edit

Information Services Department stated at 7:24 am that the National Security Department arrested five company directors of the Apple Daily this morning on suspicion of violating the National Security Law. The 5 persons, including 4 men and 1 woman, aged between 47 and 63, were suspected of violating Article 29 of the Hong Kong National Security Law, for conspiracy to colluding with foreign forces. The police also went to the arrested person's residence. Five people have been detained for investigation. At 8:07 am, it stated that the National Security Department executed a court warrant issued by the court in accordance with Article 43(1) of the Hong Kong National Security Law and Schedule 1 of the Implementation Rules this morning to search a media organization in Tseung Kwan O. The search warrant granted the police the power to search including news materials. The purpose of the operation was to search evidence for a suspected violation of the National Security Law.[51]

Police searched two arrested executives residence

edit

The five arrested persons are CEO of Next Digital Cheung Kim-hung, COO Chow Tat-kuen, vice president of Apple Daily Chan Pui-man, editor-in-chief Ryan Law and chief executive director Cheung Chi-wai. Several police officers arrived at Kornhill before 7 am. About half an hour later, Ryan Law was taken away from the apartment. At that time, his hands were handcuffed. In addition, some media said that Chan Pui-man's residence was forcibly "exploded" by the police. Inside, the search lasted two and a half hours, and two electronic devices that did not belong to Chan were taken away, including two laptop computers and a tablet computer. They were taken to Tseung Kwan O Police Station, Chai Wan Police Station and Cheung Sha Wan Police Station to assist in the investigation. By 9 am, Cheung and Law were taken away from the police station. They were then taken by a private car to the Apple Daily building to search for evidence. The lawyers was also present to find out. When Cheung and Law were brought into the building, their hands were locked in handcuffs. Nearly 10:30 am, Cheung, Chow, and Chan were taken back to the Apple Daily headquarters by police.

edit

Senior Superintendent Li Kwai-wah of the National Security Department explained the incident at 11 a.m., said that more than 500 police forces were used in the operation this morning. The police had frozen the assets of three companies, including Apple Daily, Apple Printing and AD Internet Limited totaling HK$18 million. Since 2019, Apple Daily has contained dozens of articles calling for foreign sanctions against the CCP and the SAR government.[52] The five arrested people are very important to the company's operations. They are responsible for the content style and policy of the article, and it is not ruled out that some people will be arrested. catch. At about 12 noon, 2 Apple Daily executives and 3 journalists were taken away from the headquarters. Editor-in-chief Ryan Law was taken to the North Point Police Station for investigation, and Next Media CEO Cheung Kim-hung was taken there Cheung Sha Wan Police Station; COO Chow Tat-kuen was first taken to Aberdeen Police Station, and then transferred to Western Police Station for detainment. Vice President Chan Pui-man was taken to Tseung Kwan O Police Station; after chief executive director Cheung Chi-wai left the building, he was taken to Wong Tai Sin Police Station. The police will seize documents and materials in the Apple Daily headquarters, including at least 44 computers, containing a large amount of news materials. In addition, they will seize more than a large number of past newspapers from the newspaper's library. The dates involved are from January 2017 to that day. These exhibits were put into a number of blue plastic boxes, and then the police officers moved the plastic boxes to a secret truck parked downstairs to take them away. At about 1:15 pm, the police raided the Apple Daily headquarters for more than 5 hours and then collected the team and left.[53]

edit
  •  
    A number of police officers are seen guarding outside the Apple Daily building
  •  
    The arrested director of Apple Daily arrived at the building in a police car to search for evidence
  •  
    Senior Superintendent of the National Security Department Li Kwai-wah meets with the media outside the Apple Daily headquarters
  •  
    Apple Daily vice-president Chan Pui-man was taken away by police
  •  
    One of the journalist desks after raided by police

Reactions

edit

Hong Kong

edit
  • Chief Executive Carrie Lam said on a press conference that the arrests are not related to journalism work but the endangerment to national security. She reaffirmed that no one shall use the name of journalism to carry out actions breaching the National Security Law.[54]
  • Secretary for Security John Lee said on a press conference that the arrest operation is aimed at the suspected use of journalism as a tool to endanger national security. The property frozen this time is the property of suspected criminals. He also emphasized that national security is a top priority, and endangering national security is a very serious crime, which can be sentenced to life imprisonment, and anyone engaged in any job must abide by the National Security Law and other laws. He said for those who try to use journalism as an umbrella or cover to commit crimes that endanger national security, the SAR government will definitely take the most severe measures to crack down in accordance with the law.[55][56]
  • Hong Kong Liaison Office stated that it firmly supports the SAR government and the police to strictly implement all efforts made to maintain national security and Hong Kong's prosperity and stability. Violations of the Hong Kong National Security Law and related laws will be severely sanctioned by the law.[57]
  • Office for Safeguarding National Security stated that any institution, organization and individual in the Hong Kong shall abide by the National Security Law and other laws of the Hong Kong concerning the maintenance of national security, and shall not engage in acts and activities that endanger national security. The National Security Agency in Hong Kong resolutely supports the police in performing their duties in accordance with the law, and resolutely crack down on any acts that endanger national security in accordance with the law.[58]

United Kingdom

edit
  • Foreign Minister Dominic Raab said that today's raid and raid of Apple Daily in Hong Kong showed that the CCP is using the National Security Law to target different voices, rather than addressing public safety issues. Press freedom is the CCP's commitment to protect in the Sino-British Joint Declaration. He also said that one of the rights that should be respected.[59]
  • Minister of State for Asia Nigel Adams stated on his Twitter that as a signatory of the Sino-British Joint Declaration, the CCP is committed to protecting Hong Kong's freedom of the press and freedom of speech. It must abide by these commitments. The closure of the Apple Daily today is another chilling step to eliminate opposition.[60]

United States

edit
  • Despite Apple Daily publishing right wing misinformation[61][62][63] about the controversies surrounding his son Hunter, U.S. President Joe Biden stated that through arrests, threats, and forcing through National Security Law that punishes free speech, Beijing has insisted on wielding its power to suppress independent media and silence dissenting views.[64]
  • U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the arrests was the sad day for the freedom of the press in Hong Kong. He also said that Hong Kong people have the right to freedom of the press, and supports the people of Hong Kong and all those who defend basic freedoms.[65]
  • Spokesman of the Department of State Ned Price said on briefing that the United States strongly condemns the arrest of five senior executives of the Apple Daily and its parent company, and demands their immediate release. The accusation of "crime of endangering national security by foreign forces" appears to be entirely politically motivated.[66]

Others

edit
  • The Global Affairs Canada stated that the arrest of five executives from Hong Kong's Apple Daily is another example of national security law being used to suppress freedom of the press. Canada firmly supports freedom of speech and press, which must be protected by Basic Law and comply with international norms.[67]
  • The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs Trade stated that Australia is concerned about the arrest of Apple Daily reporters and that this will have an impact on Hong Kong's freedom of speech, as stipulated in the Hong Kong Basic Law based on the Sino-British Joint Declaration.[68]
  • New Zealand Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta said that New Zealand has long been a defender of freedom of the press, which is vital to protecting basic human rights. New Zealand is concerned about the Hong Kong SAR government's forced closure of the Apple Daily, which has further eroded Hong Kong's rights and freedoms.[69]
  • The spokesperson of European External Action Service said that this raid further demonstrated how the National Security Law was used to stifle freedom of the press and freedom of speech in Hong Kong. All existing rights and freedoms of Hong Kong people must be fully protected, including freedom of the press and the press.[70]
  • Chief Cabinet Secretary of Japan Katsunobu Kato called the closure of Apple Daily a "major setback" for freedom of speech and freedom of the press in Hong Kong and voiced "increasingly grave concerns" over the situation.[71]

Effects

edit

Closure of Apple Daily

edit

On 21 June, Apple Daily announced it would have to close unless the accounts were unfrozen, as it was unable to pay its staff or support operating costs.[72] On 23 June, the newspaper said it would close "in view of staff members' safety" and the print run of 24 June would be its last.[73][74] Apple Daily also said its digital version would go offline at 23:59 Hong Kong Time (UTC+8) on 23 June.[75]

Activists backed up the news articles from Apple Daily on various blockchain platforms to ensure the content was available and free from Chinese censorship.[76]

Subsequent arrests and charges against executives

edit

On the next day after the raid, Apple Daily editor-in-chief Ryan Law and CEO Cheung Kim-hung were charged for colluding with foreign forces, and they both remanded in prison. Meanwhile, the three others (Chan Pui-man, Chow Tat-kuen and Cheun Chi-wai) were released on bail, while pending their further investigation by the police.[77]

Apple Daily editorialist "Li Ping" (Yeung Ching-kee) was arrested on 23 June “on suspicion of conspiring to collude with foreign countries or foreign forces to endanger national security”,[78][79] Fung Wai-kong, editor-in-chief of the English news section at Apple Daily, was arrested on 27 June at Hong Kong International Airport while attempting to flee the city.[78][80]

On 21 July, former executive director of now-closed Apple Daily, Lam Man-chung, was arrested for conspiracy to colluding with foreign forces.[81] On 22 July, the remaining four executives, Chan Pui-man, Lam Man-chung, Fung Wai-kwong and Yeung Ching-kee, were all charged for conspiracy to colluding with foreign forces. All of them had their bail denied while being detained at the police station, and they will appear at West Kowloon Courts on Thursday.[82]

Court proceedings

edit
 
Wikisource has original text related to this article:

In November 2022, more than a year after arrest, six former senior executives of the Apple Daily newspaper, Cheung Kim-hung, Ryan Law, Chan Pui-man, Lam Man-chung, Fung Wai-kong, and Yeung Ching-kee, pleaded guilty to the charge of conspiracy to commit collusion . Their case was heard by a panel of three handpicked national security judges. Some defendants are said to be testifying in the upcoming trial against Lai.[83][84]

Jimmy Lai had decided that he will not plea not guilty early in August.[85] Lai later hired British barrister and top British human rights lawyer Tim Owen to handle his case. The Secretary for Justice and the Bar Association first objected such decision during a case management hearing in September.[86] Two later appeals by the Department of Justice to Court of First Instance and Court of Appeal in October and November were all denied, citing public interest and general principle.[87][88]

Before decisions of the Court of Final Appeal was delivered, state media attacked the court's decision to let Owen represent Lai, quoting one pro-China figure as saying the hearing should be shifted to the mainland if necessary.[89] The prospect of asking the Chinese authorities to "interpret" the national security law was also increasingly imminent as Beijing loyalists stepped up pressure, describing as the only way to do so if the court ruled in favour of Lai.[90]

In September 2022, the HKBA opposed an attempt by Jimmy Lai to hire a lawyer from the UK, stating "the well established criteria for admitting overseas counsel on an ad hoc basis are not met."[91] In October 2022, the High Court refuted the HKBA, and allowed Lai to hire a UK lawyer.[92] In November 2022, the government lost its case in the Court of Final Appeal, paving the way for Lai to hire Tim Owen.[93]

On 28 November, the Court of Final Appeal rejected another appeal by the Department of Justice and ruled in favour of Jimmy Lai to use Owen,[94] as Justice Secretary Paul Lam failed to justify his claim of countering foreign interference through banning overseas counsels. Hours later, Chief Executive John Lee recommended the National People's Congress to interpret the law.[95] The Chinese authorities joined the pro-Beijing camp to slam the court, criticising the court's verdict as violating the "legislative spirit" and "legal logic" of the NSL which shall be on high alert.[96]

Victor Dawes of the HKBA commented that people should wait for the NPCSC to make its decision before commenting on its impact.[93] Dawes also commented "I do understand the government's position and the reasoning given by the chief executive," and also commented that banning foreign lawyers would not undermine defendants' rights and freedom of legal representation in Hong Kong.[93] Dawes also said that he believed the situation would not damage Hong Kong's judicial independence.[97]

In December 2022, after the NPCSC allowed the Chief Executive to grant or deny permission for defendants to hire foreign lawyers, the HKBA said that it believed the Chief Executive would use the permission "in a way that fosters the public's trust in upholding the rule of law."[98]

However, the Standing Committee of the NPC did not include interpreting the NSL on the forthcoming meeting agenda in December,[99] which pro-Beijing members then u-turned by saying the interpretation might not be necessary.[100][101] Hong Kong's High Court then adjourned the national security trial of Lai in December to September 2023, acknowledging Beijing has yet to determine whether he can be defended by an overseas lawyer of his choice.[102] Hong Kong Immigration Department, on the other hand, had withheld Owen’s application for an extension of his work visa.[103]

On Monday 12 August 2024, the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal upheld the conviction of Lai and six other defendants for taking part in an unauthorised procession in 2019, thereby sparking an international furore as to whether foreign judges, in particular Lord Neuberger (former President of the UK Supreme Court) should continue their presence in the Hong Kong judicial system.[104] Lai was in any case being held in prison serving a five-year sentence for lease terms violations and also pending national security charges.[105]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ "专访黎智英：北京以国安法敲响香港的丧钟". Deutsche Welle. 29 June 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-09-01. Retrieved 2020-08-30.
  2. ^ "警拘9人包括4壹傳媒高層 搜將軍澳總部4小時檢25箱證物". on.cc. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-10. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  3. ^ "港區國安法：4名壹傳媒高層被捕 警方抵將軍澳總部搜查". Oriental Daily News (in Chinese). 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-10. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  4. ^ "黎智英涉勾結外國勢力等3罪落網 兩兒子與壹傳媒高層亦被捕". Archived from the original on 2020-09-01. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  5. ^ a b c d "【直播】【港版國安法】黎智英、次子及壹傳媒高層被捕 近200警員進入《蘋果》大樓搜查". Apple Daily (in Chinese). 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-09. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  6. ^ "黎智英被捕｜李桂華率200警搜壹傳媒 蘋果總編輯要求出示手令". 香港01. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  7. ^ "記協稱警搜查壹傳媒翻看記者物件 如第三世界打壓傳媒". RTHK. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  8. ^ "【搜查蘋果】警翻查記者文件 李桂華聲稱不搜新聞材料 僅容「不威脅警安全」傳媒採訪 《立場》、港台被拒". 立場新聞. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-10. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  9. ^ "【港版國安法】《蘋果》總編要求在場監察 遭警推開兼喝斥告阻差辦公". Apple Daily (in Chinese). 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-21. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  10. ^ "持續更新：香港壹傳媒黎智英等7人涉勾結外國勢力被捕 數百警員搜查辦公大樓". BBC. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-10. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  11. ^ "【港版國安法】警司稱不搜《蘋果》編採部 惟下屬反口 趕走在座當值編輯". Apple Daily (in Chinese). 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-21. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  12. ^ "【李桂華晝夜2版本圓謊】警涉違諾翻閱《蘋果》編採部文件 無理趕走編輯礙新聞發佈". Apple Daily (in Chinese). 11 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-09-01. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
  13. ^ "警查封蘋果日報大樓半日仍未解封". Apple Daily (in Chinese). 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  14. ^ "【持續更新】黎智英涉勾結罪被捕 多2人被捕". 商業電台. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  15. ^ "【港版國安法】親中大媽團《蘋果》大樓外開香檳 5人違限聚令被票控". Apple Daily (in Chinese). 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-21. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  16. ^ "【港版國安法】警自訂標準限制多間傳媒採訪 稱需視乎知名度及規模". Apple Daily (in Chinese). 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-21. Retrieved 2021-06-28.
  17. ^ "周庭保釋離開大埔警署 形容是多次被捕中最怕的一次". Now新聞台. 11 August 2020. Retrieved 2020-08-13.
  18. ^ "Hong Kong police sift the past to pursue new security law crimes". France 24. 28 August 2020. Retrieved 2021-06-25.
  19. ^ "據報警拘黎智英當日 曾到《日經》香港辦公室". Sing Tao Daily (in Chinese). 28 August 2020.
  20. ^ "壹傳媒工會：手令不包括新聞材料 強烈譴責警方查閱". RTHK. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  21. ^ "香港外國記者會譴責警方拘捕黎智英 影響香港新聞自由". RTHK. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-12.
  22. ^ "港區國安法｜多個傳媒工會聯署聲明 促警交代大舉搜傳媒機構目的理據". Ming Pao (in Chinese). 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  23. ^ "泛民聯署強烈譴責警方針對壹傳媒大規模行動 – RTHK" (in Chinese (Taiwan)). RTHK. Retrieved 2021-06-28.
  24. ^ "港區國安法｜黎智英被捕 羅冠聰斥警拘捕行動顯「香港新聞自由之死」". Ming Pao (in Chinese). 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  25. ^ "港區國安法｜黎智英被捕 民建聯工聯會：支持警方執法保障國家安全". Ming Pao (in Chinese). 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  26. ^ "黎智英被捕｜港澳辦指「為港獨勢力提供資金」、利用所辦媒體播謠". 香港01. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
  27. ^ "【黎智英被捕】外交部：支持港府依法採取行動". 頭條日報. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-10. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
  28. ^ "【打壓蘋果】中國外交部：支持香港依法行動 環時胡錫進：港府展現了硬骨頭 無被美國制裁嚇倒". 立場新聞. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
  29. ^ 賴言曦 (10 August 2020). "港警搜查蘋果日報 陸委會譴責打壓新聞自由". 中央社 (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  30. ^ "黎智英父子被拘捕 蘇貞昌：中國應信守承諾". 聯合報 (in Chinese (Taiwan)). 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  31. ^ "約翰遜重申香港必須維護港人權利與自由" (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). RTHK. 10 August 2020.
  32. ^ "【黎智英被捕】英國外交官員亞當斯 對7人被捕深感憂慮". 香港01. 10 August 2020. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  33. ^ "【港版國安法】彭定康評黎智英被捕兼搜蘋果大樓：這是香港新聞自由歷來所受最離譜的攻擊". Apple Daily (in Chinese). Hong Kong. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-10. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  34. ^ a b "Hong Kong arrest of media mogul Jimmy Lai sparks international condemnation". South China Morning Post. 11 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-11. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
  35. ^ "The Chinese Communist Party and their puppets in Hong Kong continue to silence and intimidate those speaking up for democracy and human rights". Rick Scott. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-10. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  36. ^ "Hong Kong's democracy activists see kindred spirits in the US Capitol insurrection". Quartz. 20 January 2021. Retrieved 2024-07-09.
  37. ^ "歐盟回應黎智英等被捕 促尊重香港人權自由". Ming Pao (in Chinese). 香港. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-11. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  38. ^ 許懿安 (10 August 2020). "【黎智英被捕】歐盟籲尊重香港人權與新聞自由". 香港01 (in Traditional Chinese). Archived from the original on 2020-08-11. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  39. ^ 呢喃 (10 August 2020). "黎志英被捕：欧盟谴责北京用国安法压制言论自由". Radio France Internationale (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2020-08-11. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  40. ^ "【港版國安法】全球關注警搜查蘋果大樓 保護記者委員會：反映國安法壓制新聞自由的憂慮". Apple Daily (in Chinese). 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-21. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  41. '^ "The arrest of Apple Dailys publisher is an assault against Hong Kong's citizens' freedoms. – WAN-IFRA". wan-ifra.org. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
  42. ^ "Hong Kong: RSF denounces arrest of Apple Daily founder, who risks life imprisonment under National Security Law | Reporters without borders". Reports Without Borders. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
  43. ^ "Hong Kong police arrest Apple Daily founder Jimmy Lai under new National Security Law". Committee to Protect Journalists. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-10. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
  44. ^ "【黎智英被捕】壹傳媒股價倒升 一度反彈逾3倍". 頭條日報. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-11. Retrieved 2020-08-12.
  45. ^ "【港版國安法】壹傳媒急升最多逾3倍 上市以來最大成交 傳媒股紛爆升". Apple Daily (in Chinese). 香港. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-11. Retrieved 2020-08-10.
  46. ^ "警拘15人 指操控壹傳媒股價 3天買賣1.3萬次賺3900萬 涉欺詐洗黑錢 – 20200911 – 要聞". 明報新聞網 (in Traditional Chinese). Retrieved 2021-06-28.
  47. ^ 莊曉彤 (11 August 2020). "《蘋果》今日加印至55萬份 總編羅偉光：正常出版係對政權最大反擊". 眾新聞. Archived from the original on 2020-08-11. Retrieved 2020-08-12.
  48. ^ "【港版國安法●旺角】報檔17分鐘售190份《蘋果》 市民：「得你一份報紙睇得過」". Apple Daily (in Chinese). Hong Kong. 11 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-11. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
  49. ^ "5 Apple Daily arrests in first national security probe targeting newspaper articles". South China Morning Post. 17 June 2021. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  50. ^ a b "國安處500警搜《蘋果》大樓 2管理層3新聞工作者涉違國安法被捕 3公司資產被凍結 ｜ 蘋果日報". 23 June 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-06-23. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  51. ^ "Hong Kong Police's National Security Department arrested five persons for suspected contravention of National Security Law". www.info.gov.hk. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  52. ^ "Apple Daily: Hong Kong sends 500 officers in pro-democracy paper raid". BBC News. 17 June 2021. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  53. ^ "Hong Kong Police Raid Apple Daily Newspaper, Arrest Executives Over Calls For Sanctions". Radio Free Asia. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  54. ^ "涉傳媒執法行動非打擊新聞自由". Hong Kong's Information Services Department (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). Retrieved 2021-10-06.
  55. ^ "'Cut ties with these criminals': Hong Kong security chief warns reporters to shun Apple Daily detainees after raid". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. 17 June 2021. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  56. ^ "S for S speaks on arrest operation by Hong Kong Police's National Security Department (with video)". www.info.gov.hk. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  57. ^ "Liaison office backs arrests made under National Security Law". chinadailyhk. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  58. ^ 刘明. "National security office of central govt in HKSAR voices support for police's law enforcement action against Apple Daily". www.chinadaily.com.cn. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  59. ^ Raab, Dominic [@DominicRaab] (17 June 2021). "Today's raids & arrests at Apple Daily in Hong Kong demonstrate Beijing is using the National Security Law to target dissenting voices, not tackle public security. Freedom of the press is one of the rights China promised to protect in the Joint Declaration & should be respected" (Tweet). Retrieved 2021-07-19 – via Twitter.
  60. ^ Adams, Nigel [@nadams] (23 June 2021). "As a signatory to the Joint Declaration, China promised to protect press freedom and freedom of speech in #HongKong. It must uphold those promises. Today's closure of @AppleDaily_HK is another chilling step towards silencing opposition voices" (Tweet). Retrieved 2021-07-19 – via Twitter.
  61. ^ "Jimmy Lai distances himself from report on Hunter Biden's alleged China links". The Guardian. 31 October 2020. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2024-06-04 – via Reuters.
  62. ^ "Hong Kong media boss distances himself from contentious Hunter Biden-China report".
  63. ^ "How a fake persona laid the groundwork for a Hunter Biden conspiracy deluge". NBC News. 30 October 2020. Retrieved 2024-06-04.
  64. ^ "Statement by President Joe Biden on Hong Kong's Apple Daily". The White House. 24 June 2021. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  65. ^ Secretary Antony Blinken [@SecBlinken] (24 June 2021). "It is a sad day for media freedom in Hong Kong. People in Hong Kong have the right to freedom of the press. The U.S. remains unwavering in our support for the people of Hong Kong and all those who stand up for basic freedoms" (Tweet). Retrieved 2021-07-19 – via Twitter.
  66. ^ "Department Press Briefing – June 17, 2021 (Hong Kong Excerpts)". U.S. Consulate General Hong Kong & Macau. 17 June 2021. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  67. ^ @CanadaFP (17 June 2021). "The arrest of 5 journalists from @appledaily_hk in #HongKong is another example of the National Security Law being used to suppress media freedom. Canada strongly supports freedom of speech & of the press, which must be guaranteed under HK's Basic Law & is in line w int'l norms" (Tweet). Retrieved 2021-07-19 – via Twitter.
  68. ^ DFAT [@dfat] (17 June 2021). "Australia is concerned at the arrest of journalists from Apple Daily, and the impact this will have on freedom of expression in Hong Kong, as provided in the Basic Law underpinned by the Sino-British Joint Declaration" (Tweet). Retrieved 2021-07-19 – via Twitter.
  69. ^ Mahuta, Nanaia [@NanaiaMahuta] (24 June 2021). "Aotearoa New Zealand 🇳🇿 has long been a champion of #pressfreedoms, which are essential for the protection of fundamental human rights. We are concerned at the forced closure of Apple Daily by Hong Kong authorities, further eroding rights and freedoms in #HongKong" (Tweet). Retrieved 2021-07-19 – via Twitter.
  70. ^ "Hong Kong: Statement by the Spokesperson on the closure of Apple Daily's Hong Kong operations". European External Action Service. 23 June 2021.
  71. ^ "Japan concerned about free speech in Hong Kong | NHK WORLD-JAPAN News". NHK WORLD. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
  72. ^ "Apple Daily: HK pro-democracy paper says it will decide closure by Friday". BBC. 21 June 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-06-21. Retrieved 2021-06-23.
  73. ^ Davidson, Helen (23 June 2021). "Hong Kong's Apple Daily, symbol of pro-democracy movement, to close". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2021-06-23. Retrieved 2021-06-23.
  74. ^ "Apple Daily: Hong Kong pro-democracy paper announces closure". BBC. 23 June 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-06-23. Retrieved 2021-06-23.
  75. ^ "訂戶通知｜關於你的訂閱 About your subscription ｜ 蘋果日報". Apple Daily (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). Archived from the original on 2021-06-23. Retrieved 2021-06-23.
  76. ^ "Censored Apple Daily Content Uploaded to Blockchain | 25 June 2021". The Daily NewsBrief. Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corporation. 25 June 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25. Retrieved 2021-06-25.
  77. ^ "Three Apple Daily executives released on bail, publisher, editor-in-chief charged". South China Morning Post. 18 June 2021. Retrieved 2021-11-02.
  78. ^ a b "Security law: Ex-Apple Daily editorial writer arrested at Hong Kong airport amid reported ultimatum to defunct paper". 28 June 2021.
  79. ^ "Hong Kong police arrest editorial writer at Apple Daily newspaper". The Guardian. 23 June 2021.
  80. ^ "Hong Kong police arrest senior Apple Daily journalist at airport". The Guardian. 28 June 2021.
  81. ^ "Hong Kong police arrest former Apple Daily senior editor". New York Post. Associated Press. 21 July 2021. Retrieved 2021-11-02.
  82. ^ "HK court denies bail to Apple Daily staff facing national security charges". Reuters. 22 July 2021. Retrieved 2021-11-02.
  83. ^ Chau, Candice. "6 former senior staff of Hong Kong's Apple Daily plead guilty to collusion charge in national security case - Hong Kong Free Press HKFP". hongkongfp.com. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  84. ^ "6 Apple Daily Staff Plead Guilty to Collusion in Hong Kong". VOA. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  85. ^ Chau, Candice (22 August 2022). "Jimmy Lai to plead not guilty in national security case as Hong Kong security chief allows Apple Daily access to funds". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  86. ^ Chau, Candice (30 September 2022). "Hong Kong media tycoon Jimmy Lai's bid to hire UK lawyer for national security case opposed by justice minister". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  87. ^ Chau, Candice. "Hong Kong court allows media tycoon Jimmy Lai to hire UK lawyer for national security trial - Hong Kong Free Press HKFP". hongkongfp.com. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  88. ^ Lee, Peter (21 November 2022). "Hong Kong court dismisses justice secretary's bid to block Jimmy Lai from hiring UK lawyer for nat'l security trial". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  89. ^ Chau, Candice (24 November 2022). "State media in Hong Kong attack choice of UK lawyer for Jimmy Lai's security law trial, raise prospect of mainland hearing". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  90. ^ "譚耀宗：英狀倘准助黎 唯有釋法 湯家驊：審議中不宜公開討論 譚：有份立國安法知原意 - 20221127 - 要聞". 明報新聞網 - 每日明報 daily news (in Traditional Chinese). Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  91. ^ Chau, Candice (30 September 2022). "Hong Kong media tycoon Jimmy Lai's bid to hire UK lawyer for national security case opposed by justice minister". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-10-01.
  92. ^ Chau, Candice (19 October 2022). "Hong Kong court allows media tycoon Jimmy Lai to hire UK lawyer for national security trial". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-10-19.
  93. ^ a b c "Too early to comment on interpretation impact: Bar - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Retrieved 2022-11-29.
  94. ^ Chau, Candice. "Top court dismisses Hong Kong gov't bid to prevent media tycoon Jimmy Lai from hiring UK lawyer - Hong Kong Free Press HKFP". hongkongfp.com. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  95. ^ Wong, Brian; Lam, Jeffie; Cheng, Lilian (28 November 2022). "Hong Kong leader asks Beijing to interpret national security law after top court rules UK barrister can defend Jimmy Lai". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
  96. ^ "港澳辦:黎智英案辦理過程一些現象值得高度警惕". 信報網站 hkej.com. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  97. ^ Chau, Candice (29 November 2022). "Beijing's power to interpret the national security law should be used 'sparingly,' says top Hong Kong lawyer". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2023-02-03.
  98. ^ "Explainer: Hong Kong's national security crackdown – month 30". Hong Kong Free Press. 4 January 2023. Retrieved 2023-01-04.
  99. ^ Chau, Candice (15 December 2022). "Beijing interpretation of issue in Lai case welcome but may be overkill, says Hong Kong gov't adviser Ronny Tong". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  100. ^ 文睿 (12 December 2022). "黎智英案｜人大議程未見釋法 譚耀宗：香港自己解決就最好". 香港01 (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  101. ^ "月尾人大議程未提釋法 譚耀宗：信港有方法處理 - 20221213 - 要聞". 明報新聞網 - 每日明報 daily news (in Traditional Chinese). Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  102. ^ "Strong chance no Hong Kong national security law interpretation: Priscilla Leung". South China Morning Post. 13 December 2022. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  103. ^ agencies, Guardian staff and (1 December 2022). "Hong Kong withholds British lawyer's visa, delaying Jimmy Lai trial". the Guardian. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  104. ^ The Times Leader 13 August 2024 under the title “Poor Judgment.”
  105. ^ Jessie Pang (12 August 2024). "Hong Kong court dismisses bid by media tycoon Jimmy Lai to overturn conviction". Reuters.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apple_Daily_raids_and_arrests&oldid=1242272978"