Submission declined on 19 November 2024 by Remsense (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 16 November 2024 by Memer15151 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to Declined by Memer15151 4 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 16 November 2024 by Idoghor Melody (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Idoghor Melody 4 days ago. | |
Comment: It is not clear you are engaging with the actual criteria that have been plainly provided by previous reviewers. Please read them if you haven't already, because you can cite as many papers co-authored by the subject as you want, and you can cite as many articles that have nothing to directly do with the subject as you want, but that expressly does not qualify the subject for a Wikipedia article. If you are under the impression that being of a membership tier in an obscure professional society that is "designed for people who have been working for five years" is helping, then again, you need to actually engage with the criteria in good faith. Next time will be a rejection, and you will not be able to resubmit. Remsense ‥ 论 19:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Do not submit without improving on what the rationale for being declined says. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 12:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Chidiebere Emmanuel Okechukwu is a Nigerian healthcare scientist who gained recognition for his research work on circadian rhythm and mental health relationships among nurses working night shifts during the COVID-19 pandemic.[1]
Education
editOkechukwu graduated from the Sapienza University of Rome with a PhD in infectious diseases, microbiology, and public health in 2023.[2] In 2024, He graduated with a postgraduate certificate in clinical echocardiography from the University of the West of England.[3]
References
edit- ^ Sapienza, University of Rome (25 May 2023). "Circadian rhythm and mental health relationships among nurses working night shifts in the era of COVID-19 pandemic" (in Italian). Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza". Retrieved 20 Nov 2024.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) - ^ Sapienza, University of Rome (2022-07-15). "INFECTIOUS DISEASES, MICROBIOLOGY AND PUBLIC HEALTH". Sapienza Università di Roma. Retrieved 2024-11-16.
- ^ "Home". DC Web. 2024-06-24. Retrieved 2024-11-16.
External links
edit- Chidiebere Emmanuel Okechukwu publications indexed by Google Scholar
- Medium
- Official website
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.