Showrooming is the practice of examining merchandise in a traditional brick-and-mortar retail store or other offline setting, and then buying it online, sometimes at a lower price. Online stores often offer lower prices than their brick-and-mortar counterparts because they do not have the same overhead cost.[1] Staff writers at the Wharton School have observed that showrooming and buying elsewhere is not new in itself, but its impact has become more significant with the greater availability of online purchasing.[2]
The reverse phenomenon of showrooming is "research online, purchase offline", also known as webrooming. This is where customers research a product online before buying it at a physical store.
Prevalence
editA 2012 comScore study found 35% of U.S. consumers reported showrooming and of those, half were between 25 and 34 years old.[3] A 2013 survey polled 750 U.S. consumers, 73% of whom[4] reported having showroomed in the previous six months. However, three years of data collected and analyzed by Deloitte, refutes the prevalence of showrooming. Deloitte found that, in fact, customers who use a digital device in-store as part of their shopping process were actually more likely to make a purchase – not less.[5]
Effects on retailers
editShowrooming can be costly to retailers, not only in terms of the loss of the sale, but also due to damage caused to the store's floor samples of a product through repeated examination from consumers.[citation needed]
Showrooming[6] was said to be behind the collapse of UK photography chain Jessops[7] and Target’s decision to discontinue carrying the Amazon Kindle.[1]
Efforts to combat showrooming by retailers
editMany retailers have tried to compete with showroomers by slashing their own prices. Independent businesses, however, are advised to counter showrooming by adding value via included services and other tactics, such as making information and reviews more readily available to customers so that they might not choose to seek it out online.[8]
Some major retailers, such as Target, are attempting to battle showrooming by selling products exclusive to their stores. Walmart is allowing customers to avoid the shipping charges of online purchases by picking up the items in the stores. The same practice is expanding to European countries.[citation needed]
Some specialty fashion stores in the U.S. and Australia have introduced a "fitting fee" for browsing, which is refunded in full if the customer makes a purchase.[7]
Best Buy has guaranteed to match the online price of goods listed on Amazon.com, and in April 2013 announced it would begin to lease out space to manufacturers such as Samsung, so customers can view working products and then purchase them at the MSRP.[9]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b "Is 'showrooming' behind Target move to drop Kindle?". Content.usatoday.com. 2012-05-03. Retrieved 2012-10-22.
- ^ Wharton School, Turning the Retail ‘Showrooming Effect’ into a Value-add, Knowledge@Wharton, published 26 September 2012, accessed 25 August 2023
- ^ Kotler, Philip (2012). Principles of Marketing (15th ed.). Prentice Hall. p. 411. ISBN 978-0133084047.
- ^ "Accenture Study Shows U.S. Consumers Want a Seamless Shopping Experience Across Store, Online and Mobile that Many Retailers are Struggling to Deliver - Accenture Newsroom". newsroom.accenture.com.
- ^ "Navigating the new digital divide - Deloitte US - Retail & Distribution". Deloitte United States.
- ^ Statistics about Showrooming in the Retail Environment. Statista. April 4, 2013. Retrieved April 5, 2013.
- ^ a b Campbell, Alex (21 April 2013). "The peril of 'showrooming'". BBC News. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
- ^ Woods, Casey (2012-11-26). "Seven Ways Businesses and Communities Can Fight "Showrooming"". Retrieved 2012-11-26.
- ^ "Best Buy turns the tables on 'showrooming'". 2013-04-04. Retrieved 2014-01-28.
External links
edit
Media related to Showrooms (marketing location) at Wikimedia Commons
