Talk:.nl

Is .nl the first ccTLD?

http://www.iana.org/root-whois/us.htm and http://www.iana.org/root-whois/uk.htm appear to have existed since 1985, .nl was 1986? --66.102.80.239 23:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, the text says that it was the first ccTLD to be ever registered, that could be true even though .us and .uk were 'introduced' earlier. Uhro87 (talk) 21:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

The .uk domain is not a ccTLD according to RFC 1591 since it required all ccTLDs to use the ISO-3166 country codes, according to ISO-3166 the correct ccTLD for the United Kingdom is .gb. .gb was also introduced before .nl but can no longer be registered, so that makes .nl the first non-US ccTLD in active use that completely complies to RFC 1591. Armada651 (talk) 11:32, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

The SIDN site states "Daarmee was .nl het eerste actieve landendomein buiten de Verenigde Staten. " Which means Armada651 is right and .nl was the first active non-US ccTLD.94.210.188.233 (talk) 08:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

co.nl

Removed the .co.nl link from external links as it has no mention in the article and .co.nl is not an official extension. It is a sub-domain operated by EuroDNS, so the link can be considered spam. See: http://www.sidn.nl/ace.php/c,728,5927 http://domain.co.nl/en/co.nl-.nl-faq.html NP20 (talk) 18:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

I believe .co.nl should be mentioned in the arcticle, as many might want to know what it is. I came here looking for information on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.74.191.229 (talk) 00:09, 7 August 2013 (UTC)