This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I cited the sources in the "Controversy" section of this article. I used entries from Blogspot, which is not the gold standard for objective reliability. However, the issue the section referred to is the concern of residents -- an opinion and not an objective fact. Since they created the Blogspot entries, we must assume they expressed their feelings truthfully, and this is about as close to objective truth as we can get here. The objective fact is the action the city took in the matter, and the blogspot citations are not at all used to support that. Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 08:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
