Talk:2010–11 Temple Owls men's basketball team/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Editorofthewiki in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: YE Tropical Cyclone 17:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
First off, I fixed the redlinks in the article.
Well-written: 
- (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
- (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.[1]
- (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
- (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2] and
- (c) it contains no original research.
- (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;[3] and
- (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
- (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
- (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.[6]
YE Tropical Cyclone 16:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC) I really like this article, it is well-written and has very good content. If this article goes to WP:FAC, the wirtting may need to be more encyclopedic. However, I am passing the article, but watch out for redlinks. YE Tropical Cyclone 17:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
- Do you have any examples of the writing not being encyclopedic enough? ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 05:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- ^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage, is not required for good articles.
- ^ Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.
- ^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
- ^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.
- ^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
- ^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.