Wikipedia

Talk:2011–12 Serie A

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Rossi

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Rossi reported signed a 1+1 contract in previous season and the contract was not renewed (from Rossi side?) As we did not know did not known the contract had an automatic renew clause or not, should we only classified as Mutual consent? Matthew_hk tc 08:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Round By Round Table

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion

I thought it would be helpful to include a round-by-round table like La Liga has. I cannot figure out how to change the formatting so the team in 3rd place does not get the automatic Champions League bid, but gets the play-off round phase color/tag. The same would go down the list to the fifth place team who would get third-qualifying round in the Europa League. Any help is greatly appreciated. Wiffleclaw (talk) 06:45, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Italian friends, about the templates of positions by round, there are a lot of articles that are using the existent templates, so if this templates not coincides with the colours about the correspondent position with Serie A for European positions, you may not change the colour for this position if this templates are used for other articles (in all La Liga seasons and others the change may be involved). You can use examples I made in the past: the example of the 2011–12 Segunda División (which colour of position is variable if a reserve team occupies promotion positions) or make new templates, an example such as 1998–99 La Liga. I can help gladly, happily and without any hassle, but please before you edit a current Template think of its implications, which your changes affect all articles that are being used. Excuse me for my english and thanks to Google Translate. Greeting from Spain. tot-futbol (talk) 22:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
It already ruined. Round by round and some match was rescheduled made it impossible to "round-by-round" as some team actually had 2 games in one round (the rescheduled game) and someone changed the rule for round 22, which counting the rescheduled game to the original round instead of the actual round, which inconsistent to previous round in the table (such as Inter, if rescheduled game counting back to original round, such as Genoa game, Inter would not be that position in round 11). Matthew_hk tc 22:54, 19 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I would like to know what the rule is regarding re-scheduled games. Instead of using an actual event from the 2011-12 season, I will make up my own example. Suppose a game is postponed from Day 5, and is rescheduled on a Wednesday in between weekends where Day 10 and Day 11 are played. Once the rescheduled game is played, how is your Round-by-Round chart updated:
1. You go back and re-order (if necessary) the Day 5 column (and columns 6-10)
2. Leave columns 5-9 alone, and include the result of that game in the Day 10 column and re-order if necessary.
OR
3. Leave column Day 10 alone as it was fixed on Sunday, and include the Wednesday result in the Day 11 column.
Thanks.Juve2000 (talk) 01:33, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I think it should probably be removed. It doesn't use a source, so it isn't verifiable. It is also not a true representation of how the season's gone because of the postponed games. What's more: it seems that editors haven't been using the classification rules that Serie A uses, i.e. that head-to-head records separate teams, not goal difference.  Omg †  osh  19:45, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I DO NOT propose that the table be removed. It's probably one of the most relevant items on the whole Serie A page (after the standings). We could resolve the postponed games question by putting an asterisk (or two) in the chart when that team has played 1 or 2 less games than the rest. The classification rules used in the chart are the same ones used in the Serie A classification here on this page, ie. we ignore head-to-head results until the season is over and use goal difference for simplicity. This point has been discussed many times and has been accepted by the editors. On the other hand, my question above still has not been answered. Thanks.Juve2000 (talk) 08:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I agree that the round-by-round table is interesting, but it isn't sourced. As a result, it violates WP:OR and should be removed.  Omg †  osh  11:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Assists Table

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Can someone make a table for assists just like La Liga and EPL? - Muppeteer (talk) 23:17, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

No, because they are not officially counted by the Italian football league. --Angelo (talk) 14:22, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Football

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Might you want to mention in the lead that this article is about football? I was quite confused for a bit. Der Elbenkoenig (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Managerial changes section

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The issue has now been taken to the WP:Football talk page. Please take the dispute there from now on, and not the edit summaries. Digirami (talk) 16:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Juventus and Milan CL qualification

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Now 22-04 at 18.00 it is not sure that Juve and Milan are qualified at least CL play-off because it can ended with: Lazio 70 Milan 69 Roma 68* Juventus 68* With Roma 4p and Juventus 1p

Or can ended Lazio 68 Roma 68* Juventus 68* Milan 68* With Roma 7p, Juve 4p and Milan 3p --Stigni (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

The article is lacking prose...

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Would anyone fancy to write a WP:NPOV season summary a la 2011–12 Premier League#Season summary? It would do two good things to the article at the same time: Filling all that whitespace on the left side of the infobox AND drastically increasing the amount of prose. Equally needed is some prose regarding the team changes prior to this season at the top of the "Teams" section. --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 18:52, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 2011–12 Serie A. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on 2011–12 Serie A. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2011–12 Serie A. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2011–12_Serie_A&oldid=1196607544"