This redirect is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Regarding the model of the aircraft, is it a Piper PA-23 Apache or Piper PA-32R? We'll need a exact answer as the page name will need to be changed if the answer is the latter one. 廣九直通車 (talk) 11:56, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
The news reports say PA-23 Apache, but Aviation Safety Network changed their title and says PA-32RT. There is also a photo of the actual plane in the source, which indicates PA-32 (single engine). [1]Jizzy p (talk) 11:16, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
The ASN page should not be used as a source at all, it is part of the wikibase and cannot be considered a reliable source. YSSYguy (talk) 09:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
