This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AccuWeather article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Corporate background for Accuweather
edit[1]: Makes extensive comments on Accuweather's primary interest in making money as opposed to accurate weather reporting, and attempting to force the National Weather Service to stop furnishing weather information at no charge to enable Accuweather to develop a monopoly on weather forecasting for sale.
[3] Barry Myers, ex-CEO of Accuweather, proposed by Trump to become director of NOAA, "I was originally enrolled in meteorology as an undergraduate. I then dropped out of school because I was a horrible student. I was never interested in learning, which I look at now as sort of funny." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.173.80.235 (talk) 06:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ The Fifth Risk by Michael Lewis (W W Norton, 2018)
- ^ Wikipedia: Wood, Anthony (April 15, 2019). "Feds allege 'widespread sexual harassment' at AccuWeather while Trump nominee was CEO". Philadelphia Inquirer.
- ^ https://blogs.wsj.com/atwork/2014/03/20/meet-the-man-who-brings-you-the-weather/
ForecastWatch report
editI object to the inclusion of the ForecastWatch report and have removed its mention from the article. As I stated in Talk:AccuWeather/Archive_1, I am concerned that the ForecastWatch report is not as comprehensive as it claims, seeing as it did not evaluate the National Weather Service, and the report doesn't say whether the differences between forecasting agencies are statistically significant. Additionally, I'd like to know whether ForecastWatch has any connections to the entities it evaluates. I am open to withdrawing my objection if a consensus of non-involved, non-COI editors disagrees. Altamel (talk) 03:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)