Talk:Andrew Rutherfurd, Lord Rutherfurd
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Andrew Rutherfurd, Lord Rutherfurd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061004113303/http://www.rse.org.uk/fellowship/fells_indexp2.pdf to http://www.rse.org.uk/fellowship/fells_indexp2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Latin inscription
editLooking at the photo of the grave (here) the inscription clearly writes "superstes" not "superestes". The latter is also not a Latin word. The source, Monuments and Monumental Inscriptions in Scotland by Charles Rogers typoed it, so what to do? So far, we have one source (provided by User:DuncanHill in this discussion) rendering it correctly, but I don't know whether "The Edinburgh Drift" is enough of a RS to use for fixing this sourced typo. If someone else can find a more reliable source quoting the inscription correctly, please share! (Pinging Martinevans123 as well). ---Sluzzelin talk 16:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well spotted. Many thanks for telling me. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:49, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- you're quite welcome, though you didn't even give me the chance to fix my dangling participle before someone responded to my post. ---Sluzzelin talk 20:53, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Surely a photograph of the inscription is a reliable source? DuncanHill (talk) 20:56, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think it's likely that fixing the typo will be challenged, based on the photo. Yet a source is given in the article, and that source writes "superestes". Not sure it's quite WP:BLUESKY either. I guess we could risk using common sense ... ---Sluzzelin talk 21:05, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Strictly speaking don't we also need a WP:RS for any Latin translation? It's hardly common parlance. "Et bibere, ergo sum", as they say at the University of Woolamaloo. Rena Sharples 123 (talk) 21:39, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Strictly ballroom, and the first champion of that common parlance appears to have been Scottish too! "Fixed" (in the laziest possible way). ---Sluzzelin talk 20:38, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Strictly speaking don't we also need a WP:RS for any Latin translation? It's hardly common parlance. "Et bibere, ergo sum", as they say at the University of Woolamaloo. Rena Sharples 123 (talk) 21:39, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think it's likely that fixing the typo will be challenged, based on the photo. Yet a source is given in the article, and that source writes "superestes". Not sure it's quite WP:BLUESKY either. I guess we could risk using common sense ... ---Sluzzelin talk 21:05, 24 July 2019 (UTC)