Talk:Animal Welfare Act of 1966

Latest comment: 1 year ago by PrimeBOT in topic Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment


Untitled

edit

I edited it and added factual information. Hopefully it's better.Orange808 (talk) 16:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


I just wanted to say that all of the information on the AWA post has been copied and pasted from an animal-activist website and it is not based on the most updated version of the Animal Welfare Act.

this page is awful. Wikipedia shouldn't pass judgement on whether or not the rules are ideal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.16.229.44 (talk) 18:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

I will be editing it and added more section to this article. I will reorganize the page larencia E (talk) 7:54, 19 February 2012.

Review of changes made by GGC students

edit

This page has been updated very well over the course of this project. I especially like the expanded section on licensing and Registration. It is interesting to see how each class of business is accountable for their animals. I was also somewhat surprised by how low the fees were, I though that they would be much higher considering what sorts of institutions usually house these animals, especially the exotic species. I was also unaware that they were required to sedate or tranquilize the animals being used for research, was there any more info on this? I think if more was added to this section that it could become a valuable resource to direct activists or others with concerns about the wellbeing of research animals to. I also like how much the timeline was updated, honestly the entire page is much better put together now then it was before you all started editing. Is there any information out there about possible futures for this act? It would be really cool to be able to see where public opinion stands on this issue currently, and also what revisions will possibly be voted on in congress regarding this act. If there is no such information i understand, but i think a section on the future of animal welfare could round out the post timeline area nicely. Good Job overall though! Jonathandemart (talk) 19:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

As a Wikipedia editor unaffiliated with the classroom project, I'd just like to suggest that when there are student projects on Wikipedia, it would be helpful if the edits were done with attention to Wikipedia's guidelines for style, formatting, etc. That hasn't often been the case here. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:38, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

1st Reviewer

edit

I've noticed you have made headway on the Timeline section of the article, and made a vast improvement on adding sources to that section. One suggestion I would make is on the amendments, maybe changing the formatting to better outline what changes have been made since the Act was passed into Public Law. Here is a website http://us-code.vlex.com/source/us-code-agriculture-1006 of all of the titles and chapters for US code in agriculture. It should give you a bit more detailed information (hopefully). It will at least give you an idea of what information they removed/added to the Act around those dates. Other than that it looks really good.Smorris80 (talk) 07:18, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Animal care.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Animal care.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 27 April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Animal care.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:18, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Tagging of page

edit

Above, in this talk, I pointed out the need for attention to proper style and formatting, according to Wikipedia guidelines. During the course of the student project here, I have spent quite a bit of time and effort correcting mistakes made by the students. My hope was that the students would pay attention to my edits and advice, and make improvements in their own edits, and that, if necessary, the course instructor and campus ambassador would prod them along. Unfortunately, I see that the students appear not to be paying sufficient attention, based upon the most recent edits. For the moment, I have tagged the page for needing copyediting, and am making this comment here. I hope that this will result in better editing. If it doesn't, I may start to simply revert student edits. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:42, 28 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Bare URLs

edit

Have made a start on repairing these.--Soulparadox 11:22, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Animal Welfare Act of 1966. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Animal Welfare Act of 1966. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Animal Welfare Act of 1966. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Linguistics in the Digital Age

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 7 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gioborrero (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Gioborrero (talk) 18:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

edit

  This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Georgia Gwinnett College supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply