Talk:Arktika-class icebreaker

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 46.6.34.178 in topic Inconsistency in unit conversion

uglitude

edit

Someone feel free to clean up the ugly tables. -- Brianhe 05:54, 2 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

not exactly merging

edit

Right now there is not really any info here that shouldn't just go into the main nuclear powered icebreakers article. I'll make sure all info here is reflected there in case folks want to do a merge later. Rather than merge, though, I think ideally this article should be expanded to include more info than the main nuke icebreaker article should have. -- Akb4 09:07, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Copyediting needed

edit

As of now, the article seems to be mostly about the first Arktika-class icebreaker, Arktika, instead of the whole series of nuclear-powered icebreakers. Some copyediting is needed. Tupsumato (talk) 13:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I tried to make a start on cleaning this up, but in some places I don't know which information is supposed to apply to all ships in the class, and which just to Arktika. 86.148.152.60 (talk) 19:27, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply


Hi all who are concerned with the Arktika article, I am the author and researcher of all the information included within the History, Construction, OK900A Reactors, Propulsion, Prolonged Service Life, and Decommissioning sections. Apologies for not using my login and other credentials, but I have lost and forgotten them over the years. I can verify and show my research for these articles and have a degree in Marine Engineering and Technology from the California Maritime Academy, where I studied and wrote this article. To clear up the confusion, what I researched and wrote concerns only the ship Arktika and not the class--every ship after the Arktika had a larger reactor and other historic characteristics that set each one apart. Sorry again for the confusion and lack of proper Wikipedia mannerisms as it has been some time since I worked on this project. 76.171.91.0 (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Arktika-class icebreaker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:34, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Arktika-class icebreaker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Inconsistency in unit conversion

edit

In the subsection "Propulsion" states that the pressure of steam is "30 kgf/cm2 (2.94 MPa, or approximately 1,084 psi)". This is inconsistent since 30 kgf/cm2 (or 2.94 MPa) is about 426.7 psi. Correction is needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.6.34.178 (talk) 05:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply