This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Reviews
editThe reviews seem focussed just on what the Guardian writer thinks. Are there any other reviews which could supplement this? Beyondheat (talk) 08:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- The New York Times reviewed it. Archived copy here. There are also reviews from the Financial Times archived here and The Times archived here. JezGrove (talk) 12:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)