Talk:Battle of Tacna

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Strayed Cannon?

edit

Both this article and the one on the Battle of Iquique make reference to "strayed cannon" - does anyone know what these are? Is this a typo? I cannot find any listing on Wikipedia or the web that mentions this type of cannon. I am guessing it is a typo of a particular type of cannon (it is mentioned along with Blackey cannon, among others.) DavisGL (talk) 08:17, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Copy Editing

edit

I've retired the copy editing tag of this article. Please be more specific about what is wrong with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.196.11.130 (talk) 18:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Battle of Tacna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply