Talk:Bayt Jann

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beit Jann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725161517/http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3275609,00.html to http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3275609,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Demographic history: weird and unexplained

Taken at face value, the info doesn't make sense:

• 1596: all Muslims.
• 1875, Guérin: ca. 200, all Druze; recent large dislocation.
• 1881, SWP: 300 Muslims and 100 Druze.
• 1887 (ca.), Schumacher: about 1,215; all Druze.
• 1922, Mandate: 895 of 902 were Druze.

What's happening here? Constant large or total exchange of population? (See also very large, but not complete flight from Turkish army conscription before 1875). Some surveys less accurate than others? Also massive fluctuation in numbers, up and down. Very interesting when put into perspective, not at all addressed, just a pile of various data easily skipped by users. Arminden (talk) 20:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

"Beitegen" instead of Beit Jann

Why is the article named "Beitegen" instead of the Arabic (and official Israeli/Hebrew name) Beit Jann? Did someone think that the Crusaders are still around? Absolutely no-one (except professors of Crusader history) has heard of "Beitegen"! Monosig (talk) 19:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

User:Monosig: totally agree,Huldra (talk) 21:49, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

We can rename it, but Beit Jann or Bayt Jann? Zero^talk 10:30, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Good question. Since the pal.rem-site uses Bayt Jann, I'll put 2 cents on that, Huldra (talk) 20:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

.....and then I could move it myself, as that didn't exist,Huldra (talk) 20:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC)