Talk:Bhartṛhari
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bhartṛhari article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How many people?
editIs this article about two people? There seem to be Bhartṛhari the grammarian, Bhartṛhari the philosopher-poet, and Bharthari the king's brother. Shreevatsa (talk) 16:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
it may be exaggerated to disambiguate here. The best approach might be to keep three articles,
Vākyapadīya on the grammatical work, Śatakatraya on the poetical work, and Bhartṛhari on the date and authorship question. --dab (𒁳) 09:41, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds like a good idea. I'll get to it to sometime myself, if you don't beat me to it. (I was wondering a little whether Śatakatraya is fine, since the original work doesn't call it that, and it's just used as a convenient name for "the three Śatakas", but it appears to be common enough.) Shreevatsa (talk) 14:47, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Done now, more or less. The text can be improved, but the articles are at the right places. Shreevatsa (talk) 07:45, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Mahabhasya commentary
editApparently a commentary to Patanjali's Mahabhasya is also attributed to Bhartrhari. This is a very obscure text apparently received only via a single incomplete ms. and it is rather questionable how seriously this "attribution" is to be taken. The piece of information was inserted by Thrasuboula (talk · contribs), who seems to have good access to Bhartrhari-related info, but who does not seem to have a good grasp of how to arrange information relative to its relevance. The same user wrote the rather eccentric article "Bhartrhari's paradox" which basically reports the existence of a 1981 research paper. --dab (𒁳) 09:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bhartṛhari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121025095040/http://www.cgjungpage.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=916&Itemid=1 to http://www.cgjungpage.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=916&Itemid=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)