Talk:Bill Jones (California politician)

RfC

I am responding to the Request for Comment. It seems peculiar that someone should file a RfC when there has been no previous discussion whatsoever. Regarding the specific question -- how much detail should be included on the spamming episode -- it looks about right to me as is. --HK 15:33, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

---

Several efforts have been made by vandals to remove (whitewash) the Bill Jones spamming incidents. Nobody denies it occurred, but some just don't want the matter discussed, for some reason. It's certainly a noteworthy incident in Spamming history--the first major politician to spam the entire world in political campaigns--and defend the practice. Dananderson 18:12, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Well, the reference to the spamming seems noteworthy and properly sourced -- I'll keep this page on my watchlist. --HK 23:33, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

This was certainly a noteworthy incident and the amount of mention it receives here seems appropriate to me as well (I came for the rfc). Kit 02:39, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

The only problem I had with the spam section is that it was about 90% of the section on the Gubernatorial run. I think (perhaps naively) that people were trying editing down the spam portion to make it commensurate with the rest of the section. But the problem was that the gubernatorial section was too short and had too few details. Editors should have expanded the rest of the gubernatorial run section, rather than cutting down the spam section. Still, I think it’d be helpful to, as always, asssume good faith, rather than call people vandals and accuse them of whitewashing. I'd also like to thank Dananderson for adding the subsections. That's something I planned on doing, but he's the one who took the initiative to actually do it.Jim Campbell 01:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

At least some of the edits in question weren't edits for space or balance, but complete removal of the spamming incident. That's whitewashing. Efalk (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm in agreement that the section on spamming belongs here, and that it gets the right amount of coverage. Efalk (talk) 15:29, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Critical site the same as a spam site?

The site http://www.billjonessucks.com/ was removed as a spam link. It's clearly not spam, but I'm hesitant to restore it since I'm not familiar with wikipedia's policies on critical "attack" sites. Efalk (talk) 15:29, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Bill Jones of California.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Bill Jones of California.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:29, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Jones (California politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080929114214/http://www.yoloelections.org/news/snews/PO1131035703 to http://www.yoloelections.org/news/snews/PO1131035703

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Jones (California politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051027161513/http://nvri.org/library/cases/Porter_v_Jones/9th%20Cir%20opinion.pdf to http://www.nvri.org/library/cases/Porter_v_Jones/9th%20Cir%20opinion.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)