Talk:Burin, Nablus

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Huldra in topic The Pal.rem site's 1922 numbers....


who cut down the trees?

edit

As I wrote the first time I modified this passage, I am applying the same standard as we apply when palestinian terroists carry out terrorism but are not caught. For example, if you check out 2011 Jerusalem bus stop bombing, until september 2001 when people were arrested, it said the perpetrators were "unknown". The same standard should be used here. Red Stone Arsenal (talk) 13:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

In any case, the picture comes from a non-RS who we cannot rely on for the claim. --Shuki (talk) 23:11, 22 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wrong Burin!

edit

With this edit back in January 2014, User:Croatgoat introduced this Hadashot Arkheologiyot (Ha Ark) article about a place called Khirbat Burin into the article.

Now, just check the Conder and Kitchener 1882:178 -ref: it gives as grid Jn.....while *this* Burin, on p. 162 has grid MO.

Anyone can check for themselves: * SWP map XI has two different places, both named "Burin". The Ha Ark-article is about the *other* Burin (west of Tulkaram, north of Qalansuwa).

Hence the Guerin-ref (originally in Guerin#1875_Samarie_2 chapter 65, also refers to that place. (I haven´t checked Pierre Jacotin, but assume it is the same there)

One can of course also check the grid.no given in the Ha Ark-article.

Hence; I have removed the article, Cheers, Huldra (talk) 06:57, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Burin, Nablus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Burin, Nablus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Pal.rem site's 1922 numbers....

edit

...are totally wrong. They give only 201(!) inhabitants, Huldra (talk) 23:39, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply