Talk:Charles Linn

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Linn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090218165559/http://faculty.samford.edu:80/~dgjeane/oakhill/oh_tour14.html to http://faculty.samford.edu/~dgjeane/oakhill/oh_tour14.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Linn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130914054847/http://kcob.org/template.cfm?page=hall_fame to http://www.kcob.org/template.cfm?page=hall_fame

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Merger of statue article

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was "Do not merge." Johnnie Bob (talk) 21:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

---

I merged Statue of Charles Linn here because there was so little material and because the destruction of the statue needs the explanation of Linn's history to make sense. This was undone, so here we are. Mangoe (talk) 15:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Strong oppose. There's enough coverage for a standalone article; the statue page needs to be expanded, not deleted. Then, briefly summarize in both the Charles Linn and Linn Park, Birmingham, Alabama articles. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Having come back to review the expanded article on the statue, it's still basically one shortish paragraph. I'm just not seeing a reason not to redo the merge using the expanded material. Mangoe (talk) 14:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose. Second all points made by Another Believer. -- John (Johnnie Bob (talk) 22:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC))

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.