Talk:Chesapeake Bay Bridge–Tunnel

Latest comment: 7 months ago by 2600:6C60:0:4269:717A:280E:179F:D77C in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Welcome to the talk page for the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel.

"Most expensive in the world"

edit

I took it apon my self to remove the following line.

"Its toll of $10 to drive across is the most expensive of any bridge in the world.".

It's noted in the article Oresund Bridge that the toll at current exchange rates for a one way trip is more than three times that of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel. It's also confirmed in the below link.

www.oeresundsbron.com/

Done. — Minshullj 02:46, 27 July 2005 (EDT)

The Great Seto Bridge in Japan has a toll of 4,850 Yen. Over $40 at current exchange rates. Many bridges in Japan are more than $10 --Samuel Wantman 08:53, 7 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

What is CBBT

edit

I am uncertain what this CBBT actually is. The intro sentence says The Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel (CBBT) is a 23 mile (37 km) long facility that connects, while the Facts and Figures sub-section talkes about islands, bridges, tunnels, without an overall explaination. Note the bridge-tunnel acticle is much clearer and says the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel, a 23-mile long structure which crosses the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay with a combination of bridges and tunnels over two widely separated shipping channels, using four man-made islands built in the bay as portals. I will cut-n-paste these words in later, but perhaps it would be better for someone who knows to clarify what CBBT is for this article. Wendell 13:00, 17 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I assume CBBT is a common abbreviation for Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel (the first letters of each word). --Joe Sewell 16:48, 18 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
Both suggestions have finally been incorporated into the article. Vaoverland 07:17, 7 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

additional refs

edit

I'll fold these in later if I get a chance, but I don't want to lose them (deep in editing something else)

I ran across these trying to find info about Merritt-Chapman & Scott, Hope that is useful info. Happy editing! ++Lar: t/c 17:43, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Any bus service?

edit

Does anyone know any bus service for this Bridge-Tunnel while it is too long to allow non-motorized traffic?--Jusjih 07:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Never mind. I have found the official answer myself.--Jusjih (talk) 23:08, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not one of the ASCE 7 wonders?

edit

According to the ASCE article in the wikipedia and the ASCE site http://www.asce.org/history/seven_wonders.cfm The CBBT is not one of the seven engineering wonders of the modern world. Wbakker2 00:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I added mention that it is no longer on the list. I was not able to verify that it ever was. -- Samuel Wantman 06:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Most expensive crossing in the US"?

edit

Wow, someone's trying to make it seem like a gold mine: first "in the world", then this.

OK, so define "expensive": does it mean the most costly at one time? Then possibly they might be right, but we need a cite to prove it. Does it mean most costly per mile? No way, seeing as the less-than-a-mile long bridges into New York City, the George Washington Bridge, the Goethals Bridge and even the mile-or-so long ones (the Lincoln/Holland Tunnels, the Outerbridge Crossing, and the Bayonne Bridge) cost $6. If that was the price to cross the CBBT, it would cost $138 to cross! $17's definitely seems a pittance compared to those ailing structures in the Big Apple.

Heck, even the bridges of Philly cost $3 for about a mile. The CBBT works out to 73.9¢/mi (and before you ask me to cite that, it's simple math), which is cheaper than most crossings of the US. So, elaborate and cite if you want it in the article. EaglesFanInTampa (formerly Jimbo) 13:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Question for someone who uses the bridge?

edit

I see that a crossing $12 plus return $5 within 24 hours is permitted. But what if you just want to drive accross the bridge and back? Is there a U-turn anywhere after you get into the toll section? Gohiking 18:02, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Technically...yes. Legally...I'd guess not. Coming from the south (so...going north), when you get to the northern end of the bridge, as in after Fisherman's Island, there is a scenic overlook on the Bay side. It is south of the southbound toll plaza, so if you turn in there, you can technically turn around because you can get to either direction from this scenic parking lot. Mapquest shows it well, follow this link and then go to the north end of the bridge; just after the Smith Island Inlet you can see a parking lot structure on the left. If you're going south, your only chance to turn around would be at Island 1. This may not be totally legal and I'd imagine they frown upon it and expect you to use the honor system. --MPD T / C 18:17, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The five-year maintenance factoid

edit

The factoid seems to come from the History Channel program Modern Marvels. The episode on the CBBT is airing again today, and the mentioned factoid is used in the show. Perhaps we can use this as the needed citation.—68.10.101.122 21:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't have TV, but the proper template, if someone is going to view the show would be
{{cite episode
 | title =
 | episodelink = 
 | series = 
 | serieslink = 
 | airdate = 
 | season = 
 | number = }}
-- VegitaU 21:55, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
The five-year fact is true. That program was really informative, thanks for letting us know or else I wouldn't have known about it! I'll work some of these citations when I get some free time. --MPD T / C 05:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Don't worry about the citation. I just did it myself.—-- WhosAsking (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chesapeake Bay Bridge–Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:57, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Parallel Thimble Shoal Tunnel (PTST) Project

edit

It may be worth adding a section on the PTST. The article is a little stale, and I thought I'd note these two sources if someone wanted to write an update [1] [2] Also is there a source that explains why adding a $1b tunnel is a needful thing, when the CBBT will still have a single-lane tunnel at the Chesapeake Channel? KevinCuddeback (talk) 20:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Chesapeake Bay Bridge–Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Chesapeake Bay Bridge–Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wind Restrictions today? 2600:6C60:0:4269:717A:280E:179F:D77C (talk) 12:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply