Talk:Chet Raymo
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chet Raymo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720050818/http://www.stonehill.edu/x16569.xml to http://www.stonehill.edu/x16569.xml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Any discussion of science blending with religion is only a discussion of religion- there cannot be any science in it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-overlapping_magisteria — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.237.208.93 (talk) 19:12, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Being handed a copy of Sceptic and True Believes, I immediately went to the index to "test" the book for S J Gould's comments in this area; he was there, but only in the context of his Nobel Prize-winning theory on Punctuated Equilibrium- no mention of NOMA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-overlapping_magisteria). To me it invalidates Raymo's body of work, and I definitely believe physics, and thereby the physicist, is not the path to understanding the relation of science to religion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.237.208.93 (talk) 19:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)