Talk:Cluttering

older entries

I haven't heard that "inability to listen" is associated with cluttering. It sounds plausable but I'd like to see a reference.Tdkehoe 17:14, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

I hope they could describer better the way that cluttering manifest as you speak, I tend to change a letter on a world, specially when I'm nervous or tense, like in a interview or on a date so the worst moments to be doing that and it has really bad implications on my life, but I could not understand by what was writing about cluttering if my problem is included or it's something also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.222.38.65 (talk) 20:17, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

The phrase "simply being unsure of what one wants to say." doesn't belong. I've never seen that in the literature and it sounds pejorative.Tdkehoe 17:45, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

As a person who does clutter I can see that this is very true. I often find myself thinking of better words for a subject. So rather than store I might say grocery store but while my mind is processing that I might say 'g, g ... place where you shop for groceries', I have of course gotten much better over the years, but if someone knows me long enough they will notice that I do this, either that or I will speak at an insane rate of speed, this happens more often when I am doing several things at once or also contiplating something else while talking to a person. Quazywabbit 01:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Does someone have a transcript and/or sound file that provides a good example of cluttering? I think that would be a valuable improvement to the article. 24.34.190.157 (talk) 13:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

unsure of what one wants to say

This is a quote from the most famous piece and most widely distributed piece of literature on cluttering, a pamphlet produced by the Stuttering Foundation, and written by Dr. St. Louis. It is in the first paragraph of that pamphlet. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fredsmith2 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC).

Howdy i have something i think needs to be addressed

HI I don't mean to complain and im not even sure if there is a problem But it seems like they make clutters out as bad thing or with a negative spin on it

-Article reads like it was written by a pissed off stutterer. Is there some kind of stutterer/clutterer rivalry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.211.82 (talk) 21:54, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

I agree that there is a surplus of information here about stuttering that actually makes the article more confusing to people who are trying to get a handle on cluttering. If I want to read about stuttering, I'll just go to the stuttering article... since I'm here, I'd rather read about cluttering. I also agree that there may be some POV stuff going on here in associating certain personality traits with stuttering vs. cluttering. It seems more likely that stuttering/cluttering give a misleading impression of certain personality traits due to the disconnect between what the person is thinking/feeling and what actually comes out. 24.34.190.157 (talk) 13:39, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Overlapping articles

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was not to merge the two articles. Bilby (talk) 03:36, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

---

There's an article about Cluttered speech that to me seems mostly overlapping. Shouldn't they be merged? The Seventh Taylor (talk) 18:14, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes, they should - I've placed merge templates on the articles to alert people to this. Terraxos (talk) 00:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

I think you should merge them. They are similar, aren't they? --Mark Chung (talk) 06:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Cluttered speech would be better merged into voice disorders. Cluttering is about the specific speech disorder, not a list of various speech disorders, ailments, or symptoms, like cluttered speech. Fredsmith2 (talk) 19:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

I am against merging, because Cluttering is a disorder, whereas cluttered speech can happen to anybody. Lova Falk talk 16:45, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree, the articles describe two related but different things, and are distinct enough to warrant their own articles. Kyoakoa (talk) 16:06, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

DYK

• Template:Did you know nominations/Cluttering

Suggestions for improvement of the cluttering page

To me, it seems that the article page clearly helps define what cluttering is and how it is different from stuttering. However, it does seem to fail to clarify in detail more options for diagnosing cluttering and the various treatment options. The article gives simple and somewhat vague answers to the proper treatments and diagnosis of this language disorder. I suggest in order to further improve this page to list some actual techniques used for proper diagnosis of cluttering as well as adding further information to the treatments of cluttering — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drew7182643 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cluttering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070406231648/http://www.asha.org:80/about/publications/leader-online/archives/2003/q4/f031118a.htm to http://www.asha.org/about/publications/leader-online/archives/2003/q4/f031118a.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cluttering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120729022709/http://www.content.onlypunjab.com/Article/Fluency-Disorders--Stuttering-vs-Cluttering/4200320092003249120 to http://www.content.onlypunjab.com/Article/Fluency-Disorders--Stuttering-vs-Cluttering/4200320092003249120
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.asha.org/about/publications/leader-online/archives/2003/q4/f031118a.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Gustavus Adolphus College supported by WikiProject Psychology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 15:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)