Talk:Danny Sullivan

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:08, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Where are you now Danny?12.36.103.167 (talk) 23:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved.(non-admin closure) Red Slash 19:51, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply



Danny SullivanDanny Sullivan (racing driver) – I think the SEO journalist has an equal claim to fame as the racing driver. This guy founded the two most-used resources in SEO. In addition, there are at least four other notable Danny Sullivans. Since this person is not "more likely than all the other topics combined" to be sought, we can say this is not the primary topic. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 08:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Support. DH85868993 (talk) 08:13, 5 September 2013 (UTC) Oppose per The Bushranger and Bretonbanquet. DH85868993 (talk) 04:07, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose - Creating SEOs, even multiple resources, does not reach the level of notability of an Indianapolis 500 victory, especially when this Sullivan is also very well known for announcing work, Formula One and NASCAR careers, including a win in the 24 Hours of Daytona, the most prestigious endurance event in the Western Hemisphere and the second most prestigious in the world. The other Danny Sullivans are a 6-game rugby player, a 2-game hockey player, a fictional character who really is not notable enough to have an article, and a footballer who made his professional debut two days ago. The other four Danny Sullivans are, with no disrespect to them, utterly irrelevant when it comes to "all the other topics combined", and the SEO fellow, quite frankly, doesn't reach the level of notability needed to bump the driver away from the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. - The Bushranger One ping only 09:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose – I have to agree with The Bushranger. Sullivan the racing driver isn't just any old racing driver, he's a winner of the Indy 500, one of the world's most celebrated sports events. This is apart from his top-level participation in F1 and NASCAR. If he had been an also-ran I might support this move (and I rarely oppose racing driver article moves), but an SEO journalist isn't going to come anywhere near this level of notability. Moreover, I'd say outside the world of search engines and the machinations of the internet, the journalist is not well known at all, and I'd be willing to bet that his resources are not exactly household names, unlike the Indy 500. Without wishing to be flippant, I'd never heard of any of the entities in the journalist's article. The other Danny Sullivans are barely notable within their own fields, let alone more widely. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:10, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per the Bushranger and Bretonbanquet -Drdisque (talk) 04:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose seems pointless to ask whether more books are printed about racing or search engines, but what links here shows a big housekeeping job for anyone tidying up after the proposed move if Danny Sullivan becomes a dab. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per Bretonbanquet , though the suggested title of the nominator should be created as a redirect. Perhaps the disambiguation page "Danny Sullivan (disambiguation)" should be split off to address the concerns of prominence of "Danny" -- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 04:23, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per The Bushranger. Royalbroil 06:30, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Danny Sullivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Danny Sullivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply